My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01385
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01385
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 10:40:01 AM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:58:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Title
Guide for Selecting Roughness Coefficient n Values for Stream Channels
Date
12/1/1963
Prepared By
USDA Soil Conservation Service
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />B.4 <br /> <br />Relative effect of obstructions MOdif~~~~~ <br /> <br />Negligible <br />Minor <br />Appreciable <br />Severe <br /> <br />0.000 <br />0,010 to 0.015 <br />0.020 to 0,030 <br />0,040 to 0.060 <br /> <br />5th step. Selection of modifying value for vegetation. The re- <br />tarding effect of vegetation is probably due primarily to the turbulence <br />induced as the water flows around and' between the limbs, sterns and foliage, <br />and secondarily to reduction in cross section, As depth and velocity in- <br />crease; the force of the flowing water tends to bend the vegetation. <br />Therefore, the ability of vegetation to cause turbulence is partly relat- <br />ed to its resistance to bending force. Furthermore, the amount and <br />character of foliage; that is, the grpwing season condition versus dormant <br />season condition is important, In ju~ging the retarding effect of vegeta- <br />tion, critical consideration should be given to the following: the height <br />in relation to depth of flow; the capacity to resist bending; the degree <br />to which the cross section is occupied or blocked out; the transverse and <br />longitudinal distribution of vegetatipn of different types, densities and <br />heights in the reach under consideration, The following table may be used <br />as a guide to the selection: <br /> <br />Vegetation and flow conditions <br />comparable to: <br /> <br />Degree of <br />effect on n <br /> <br />Range in modify- <br />ing value <br /> <br />Dense growths of flexible turf grasses <br />or weeds, of which Bermuda and blue grasses <br />are examples, where the average depth. of <br />flow is 2 to 3 times the height of vegetation, Low <br /> <br />0.005 to 0,010 <br /> <br />Supple seedling tree switches such as,willow, <br />cottonwood or salt cedar where the average <br />depth of flow is 3 to 4 times the height of <br />the vegetation. <br /> <br />Turf grasses where the average depth Of <br />flow is 1 to 2 times the height of vegetation. <br /> <br />,.. <br /> <br />Stemmy grasses, weeds or tree seedlings with <br />moderate cover where the average depth of <br />flow is 2 to 3 times the height of vegetation, Medium <br /> <br />0,010 to 0.025 <br /> <br />Brushy growths, moderately dense, similar to <br />willows 1 to 2 years old, dormant sea~on, <br />along side slopes of channel with no Signif- <br />icant vegetation along the channel bottom, <br />where the hydraulic radius is greater than <br />2 feet, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.