My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01374
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01374
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:58:18 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:58:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
521
County
Weld
Community
Erie, Firestone, Dacono
Stream Name
Tri-town drainageway, Godding Hollow Basin
Title
South Weld I-25 Corridor Master Drainage Plan
Date
9/8/1999
Prepared For
Weld County
Prepared By
Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />photography was utilized from a 1998 aerial flight, Survey requirements included <br />the collection of data necessary to defme existing structures (bridges, channels, <br />culverts, outlet structures, etc.) with respect to geometric configuration, invert and <br />overtopping elevations, etc, <br /> <br />4. Inventory of Existing Facilities, All information related to the major storm <br />drainage facilities within the major drainageway of each basin was compiled. <br />Existing detention facilities, culverts, bridges, road crossings, drainage channels, ' <br />irrigation ditches, and major storm sewers were inventoried and evaluated. The <br />capacity of each structure was determined and the feasibility of integrating existing <br />facilities into the master drainage plan investigated. <br /> <br />5. Hydrologic Analysis and Modeling. A detailed hydrologic model was developed <br />and utilized to simulate the stormwater runoff for three scenarios: (a) existing or <br />"as is" condition; (b) future development conditions with existing facilities; and (c) <br />future developrrient conditions with on-site detention and proposed improvements, <br /> <br />6, Hydraulic Analysis and Modeling. A detailed hydraulic analysis was completed <br />to evaluate the structures identified during the inventory of existing facilities. All <br />proposed improvements were also evaluated during the hydraulic analysis and <br />modeling efforts. <br /> <br />7, Drainageway Planning and Alternative Development Storm drainage <br />improvements were identified to mitigate the existing and potential future flood <br />hazard problems. Alternative stormwater management plans were conceptually <br />developed and internally reviewed and refined with input from the staff of the Weld <br />County Public Works Department and the 1-25 MDP Task Force. <br /> <br />8, Basin Drainage Criteria, Criteria for the planning and design of drainage facilities <br />were developed in conjunction with the 1-25 MDP Task Force. The criteria <br />specifically focused on the planning and design of major drainageway facilities/road <br />crossings and on-site detention requirements, <br /> <br />9. Funding/Financing Alternatives. An investigation of various funding and financing' <br />alternatives was completed. The results of the investigation along with a <br />recommendation were presented to the governing bodies and interested parties, <br /> <br />10, R~orting and Technical Documentation The results of the master planning effort <br />are summarized in this report. All recommended improvements are identified <br />along with preliminary design drawings and detailed cost estimates. An <br />implementation plan for the construction of the proposed improvements is <br />presented, Documentation in the form of technical appendices and a project <br />notebook is provided to allow replication of the steps taken to: (a) generate the <br />design flows , (b) estimate the capacity of the existing and future facilities, (c) <br />develop and evaluate the alternative plans, and (d) generate the cost estimates. <br /> <br />T:IOPENlCowe1.dOJ\coweldOJ fnJ rpJ,wpd <br /> <br />1.3 <br /> <br />Sepu.mbe.r 8, 1999 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.