Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />II <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />III. ,INVENTORY OF EXISTING FACILITIES <br /> <br />Within the Godding Hollow Basin, the existing storm drainage facilities are largely <br />associated with the limited development that has occurred within the basin. Small, local detention <br />ponds, storm sewers, and conveyance channels comprise the network of drainage facilities that <br />provide flood control during the minor and major storm events. Minimal land development has <br />occurred adjacent to the major drainageway. Consequently, the structures along the major <br />drainageway of Godding Hollow that were investigated as part of this master planning effort <br />include road/railroad/canal crossings and detention storage provided by road/railroad <br />embankments, <br />Within the Tri- Town Basin, the existing storm drainage facilities are largely associated <br />with the development in the vicinity of Frederick and Firestone. Similar to the Godding Hollow <br />Basin, small local detention ponds, storm sewers, and conveyance channels comprise the network <br />of drainage facilities that provide flood control during the minor storm events., Although land <br />development has occurred adjacent to the major drainageway in the upper ponion of the basin, in <br />general, limited improvements have been made along the main channel. The majority of the <br />structures investigated in the Tri-Town Basin included roadlrailroadlcanal crossings and any <br />significant detention storage, <br />As part of this master planning effort, an inventory of the existing facilities associated with <br />the major drainageway of each basin was conducted. The inventory and evaluation of each facility <br />involved: (a) field reconnaissance to document location, condition and additional data <br />requirements; (b) review of available design and as-built drawings; (c) collection of site-specific <br />survey data; and (d) evaluation of the hydraulic capacity. Tables 3,1 and 3.2 summarize the <br />results of the inventory and evaluation of the existing facilities. Sheet 1 presents the size and <br />location of the inventoried existing drainage facilities. Specific information related to these <br />facilities is provided in the following paragraphs. More detailed data and photographic <br />documentation associated with each facility are provided in the project notebook submitted in <br />conjunction with this report, <br /> <br />3.1 Detention Facilities <br /> <br />Along the major drainageways, few detention facilities exist that provide effective <br />reduction of peak discharges during minor and major storm events, The effective detention <br /> <br />T:IOPENlCoweldO]lcoweldOJ fnl rpt.wpd <br /> <br />3.1 <br /> <br />September 8, 1999 <br />