Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />FLOW <br /> <br />PEAK <br /> <br />RISING <br />LIMB <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br />. <br />A <br />4 <br />~ <br /> <br />FALLING <br />LIMB <br /> <br />4 <br />, <br />..I <br />. <br />'I <br />oj <br />l <br />. <br />~ <br /> <br />4 <br />l <br />1 <br />. <br />i <br />j <br />~ <br />A <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />TIME <br /> <br />~ <br />l <br />~ <br />I <br />~ <br />I <br /> <br />GROUNDWATER CONTRIBUTION <br /> <br />period is the inverse of the frequency. <br /> <br />. <br />l <br />~ <br /> <br />Figure II-l.--Flood hydrograpb. <br /> <br />accuracy of the estimate improves as the <br />length of the record increases. For <br />culvert sites significantly removed from <br />the gage, the peak design flow may have <br />to be adjusted. <br /> <br />A typical statistical analysis for <br />data from a gaged site proceeds as fol- <br />lows, First, the annual peak flows for <br />the site are arranged in descending or- <br />der. Then, the plotting position is <br />calculated by one of several available <br />formulas, (11) The peak floods are then <br />plotted on a probability paper to define <br />the frequency relationship for the gage <br />site, If Gumbel paper (Type I extremal <br />distribution) is used to plot the data, <br />the mean of the data (mean annual flood) <br />will plot at a frequency of 0.429. This <br />equates to a return period of 2.33 years. <br />Other return periods can be read from <br />the frequency plot, because the return <br /> <br />Ungaged sites present more of a design <br />problem, Stream gage data for particular <br />regions have been utilized to develop <br />statistical regression equations for <br />most areas of the country. These equa- <br />tions generally require basic watershed <br />parameters such as drainage area and <br />average stream slope. Using the required <br />data, peak design flows can be determined <br />for un gaged sites within that region. <br />Deterministic methods are also available <br />which attempt to model the rainfall-runoff <br />process. The key input parameter in <br />these methods is rainfall which must be <br />related to a return period. The amount <br />of watershed data required is dependent <br />upon the sophistication of the model. <br />Table 2 lists some of the commonly em- <br />ployed methods of peak flow generation for <br />gaged and ungaged sites, <br /> <br />l <br />, <br /> <br />1 <br />i <br />t <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />l <br />i <br /> <br />j <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />1 <br />~ <br />