My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01339
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01339
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:58:19 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:56:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Larimer
Community
Loveland
Stream Name
Big Thompson River
Title
Application to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for a License to Re-construct, Operate, and Maintain the Loveland Project
Date
11/1/1977
Prepared For
FERC
Prepared By
Loveland
Floodplain - Doc Type
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Special <br />City of <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />H. 1. <br /> <br />Environmental Clearance Worksheet <br />Loveland, Colorado <br /> <br />Impact of Environment on Project (continued) <br /> <br />c, Aesthetic Environment <br /> <br />(1) Beneficial Impacts <br /> <br />The terrain of the canyon is such that cosmetic treatment of the <br />pipeline and power plant building will be required to compliment <br />it. Th i s trea tment will result in a mi nor cos t increase. <br /> <br />(2) Adverse Impacts - None <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />Impact of Project on Envi ronment <br />a. Physical Environment <br /> <br />(1) Beneficial Impacts <br /> <br />(a) The reservoir provided by the diversion dam will create a fish <br />habitat that is far superior to the present habitat in the Big <br />Thompson river and will be stocked as it was prior to the <br />disaster. <br /> <br />(b) The proposed diversion dam will be more stable than the pre- <br />disaster structure. Therefore, it will provide greater <br />protection to the environs in flooding situations, <br /> <br />(2) Adverse Impacts <br /> <br />(a) <br /> <br />The first paragraph on Page 21 of the applicant's environmental <br />assessment report states that a controlled gate will allow <br />approximately two (2) cubic feet per second (CFS) of water to <br />flow between the dam and the tailrace of the power plant and <br />that the flow will support fish life. This is incorrect <br />according to the Colorado Division of Wildlife because a flow <br />of 2-5 CFS will not support fish life, although such a flow <br />will help to maintain aquatic insect life between the dam and <br />the tailrace, during 10\'1 flow periods. In addition, the <br />recent design changes will allow a minimum flow of approximately <br />3 CFS instead of 2 CFS. Even though the proposed minimum releases <br />will not allow for fish life in this 1.6 mile stretch of the <br />Big Thompson river, it should be noted that the predisaster flow <br />did not allow for fish life either. <br /> <br />There will be some short term noise, air and water pollution <br />during construction due to the operation of heavy construction <br />equipment near the river. Water pollution will be relatively <br />light and will consist of sand and silt generated at the dam <br />site by heavy equipment. This will be kept to a minimum by <br />constructing settlement ponds directly below the dam site thus <br />slowing the water velocity to allow the solids to settle out. <br />Accumulated solids will then be mechanically removed and hauled <br />away by truck, There will be no ~ term effects of such <br />pollution, -- ---- <br /> <br />(b) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.