Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />PREFACE <br /> <br />PloDding in the SOllthcd$t portio" of5014,I1 DiJkotl1 has bCI."1 both "ClItf? ami ,IIronic, and its long history has bee" <br /> <br />well dOCllmcmed. If solutions to this ollgoi,tg floodiNg problem wac simple or evide,,!, in all probability they wOllld have been <br /> <br />implemetlted by flOW, BUI the solutions are IIot simple, /lor IIrc they always obvious or affordable. <br /> <br />THIS NEW FlOOD MmGATION PlANNING <br />process auempts to overcome those <br />obstacles,not onlyforthefloods that in. <br />undated this area in 1993. but also in response <br />to the long-standing pattern of recurrent flood- <br />ing throughout the Vermillion River Basin. <br />The multi-objective mitigation plan. <br />ning proctsS,. of which this plan is the first <br />product, is a unique and innovative attempt <br />by two federal agencies to work together on <br />flooding in the VermiUion Basin. The Federal <br />Emergency Management Agencyk Mitigation <br />Division brings to me planning process flood <br />mitigation techniques, mitigation funding. <br />and a strong. existing state-federal partner- <br />ship. The National Park Service's Rivers, Trails <br />and Conservation Assistance Program brings <br />expertise in facilitated planning and con- <br />sensus building. local citizen "bottom-up" <br />planning. and experience in greenway and <br />river corridor design. The two agencies havt <br />melded these complementary components <br /> <br />to create a process that has become known as <br />"multi-objective hazard mitigation planning." <br />These words imply identifying and <br />implementing a broad spectrum of activities <br />to reduce the effects of flooding in the Basin, <br />while at the same time seeking out ways to <br />enhance the overall quality of life for its resi- <br />dents. The process is designed to: <br />. Make use of existing programs, <br />studies, and other resources. <br />. Build upon the public and private <br />sources of funding that already exist. <br />. Focus on chronic flooding <br />problems throughout a water-related geo- <br />graphic unit. <br />. Utilize a multi-disciplinary, multi. <br />objective, multi-agency, bottom-up <br />partnership to solving problems. <br />. Build local consensus, local citizen <br />commilment. and cooperation among <br />local units of government to solve a <br />common problem. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The process: <br />. Does not replace existing <br />Interagency Hazard Mitigation Teams <br />or their activiries; <br />. Creates no new top-down, single-purpose <br />or one-dimensional programs; <br />. Imposes no new top-down federal <br />or state regulations; and <br />. Does not propose single-agency, <br />multi-purpose projects. <br /> <br />It is envisioned that the result of this process <br />will be to bring to bear all of the planning. <br />engineering, and financial resources available <br />to solve a common problem. while at the same <br />time advancing other local goals and objec- <br />tives identified by the citizens. <br /> <br />Bob Cox <br /> <br />Mitigatinn Division <br />Federal Emergency Mano.gemrnt Agency, <br />Region VIII <br />