Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />- . <br /> <br />2.4 Flood Protection Measures <br /> <br />No flood protection measures are presently in effect in Clear <br />Creek County. The Public Service Company of Colorado maintains <br />a relatively large dam and reservoir at their Cabin Creek pumped <br />storage faci I ity south of the City. This dam regulates South <br />Clear Creek but its operating criteria are to release amounts <br />equal to inflow to the reservoir, thereby negating any possible <br />effects on flood flows. Georgetown Lake and other smal I water <br />supply and irrigation reservoirs have a very minimal effect on <br />flood peaks due to their smal I storage capacities and the fact <br />that they remain ful I or nearly so for the majority of the flood <br />season. <br /> <br />3.0 <br /> <br />ENGINEERING METHODS. <br /> <br />For streams studied within the County, standard hydrologic and <br />hydraulic study methods were used to determine the flood hazard <br />data required for this study. Floods having recurrence intervals <br />of 10, 50, 100, and 500 years have been selected as having special <br />significance for the land use and flood insurance program. The <br />analyses reported here reflect both current and planned conditions in <br />the watersheds of the streams. <br /> <br />3.1 Hydrologic Analysis <br /> <br />Hydrologic analyses were carried out to establ ish the peak <br />discharge-frequency relationships for floods of the selected <br />recurrence intervals for each stream studied within the County. <br /> <br />For each stream, flood-flow frequency data were based on a <br />regional hydrologic analyses set forth in a "Manual for Estimating <br />Flood Characteristics of Natural-Flow Streams in Colorado" (Reference <br />12). The method consists of a series of regression equations <br />from which flood characteristics can be estimated from measurable <br />physical and ci imatic parameters of drainage basins. Drainage area <br />and normal annual precipitation over that area are the two factors <br />required to estimate flood flows. <br /> <br />Results of the above described regional hydrologic analyses were <br />compared to statistical analyses of historical discharge records <br />at two gaging stations within Clear Creek County operated by the <br />U. S. Geological Survey (References 19, 20 & 23-25). Analysis of <br />these two stations fo.1 lowed the standard log-Pearson Type I I I method <br />as outlined by the Water Resources Counci I (Reference 26). Com- <br />parisons of Clear Creek at Lawson (29 years of record) and at Fal I <br />River (9 years of record) to results of the regional hydrologic <br />analysis showed a maximum difference in flood flows of 29 per cent <br />and an average difference of only 10 per cent. This error is <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />- <br />