Laserfiche WebLink
<br />inaccurate under certain conditions and could lead <br />to errors in computations of peak-flow velocity and <br />subsequent calculations of stream power. <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />This report presents data and describes <br />methods that are intended to aid water-resource <br />managers and engineers in the process of assessing <br />peak-flow resistance in vegetated channels. The <br />semi empirical relation presented can be used to <br />estimate the effects of flow on main-channel <br />vegetation conditions and consequent effects on <br />computations of channel-conveyance and water- <br />surface elevations. The relation is presented for the <br />purpose of mitigating possible gross errors in these <br />conveyance computations. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />The data and relation presented in this report <br />can be used for a wide range of hydraulic <br />applications that require assessment of channel and <br />vegetation conditions during peak flow. Potential <br />applications include postflow-discharge deter- <br />minations (indirect measurements), standard-step <br />computations to delineate flood-plain boundaries, <br />and capacity computations for hydraulic structures. <br />Although transferable to sites with similar channel <br />and vegetation conditions, the information <br />presented in this report should only be applied on <br />the basis of sound engineering judgment. The high <br />degree of variability in channel and vegetation <br />conditions may not be properly accounted for by <br />the simple approach and methods set forth in this <br />investigation. The most applicable and accurate <br />transfer of results would be to vegetation growing <br />in the main channel oftrapezoidal, uniform reaches <br />such as constructed channels in urban areas. <br />Further research may result in development of a <br />substantive relation that can reliably predict the <br />shear stresses associated with vegetation removal. <br /> <br />SELECTED REFERENCES <br /> <br />Aldridge, B.N., and Eychaner, J.H., 1984, Floods of <br />October 1977 in southern Arizona and March 1978 <br />in central Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey <br />Water-Supply Paper 2223, 143 p. <br /> <br />Aldridge, B.N., and Garrett, J.M., 1973, Roughness <br />coefficients for stream channels in Arizona: U.S. <br />Geological Survey unnumbered open-file report, <br />87p. <br />Arcement, G.l, and Schneider, V.R., 1989, Guide for <br />selecting Manning's roughness coefficient for <br />natural channels and flood plains: U.S. Geological <br />Survey Water-Supply Paper 2339, 38 p. <br />Burkham, D.E., 1970, Precipitation, streamflow, and <br />major floods at selected sites in the Gila River <br />drainage basin above Coolidge Dam, Arizona: U.S. <br />Geological Survey Professional Paper 655--C, <br />p. CI-C13. <br />1976, Hydraulic effects of changes in bottom <br />land vegetation on three major floods, Gila River, in <br />southeastern Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey <br />Professional Paper 655-J, 14 p. <br />Carson, M.A., and Griffiths, G.A., 1985, Tractive shear <br />stress and the onset of bed particle movement in <br />gravel stream channels--Different equations for <br />different purposes: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, <br />Journal of Hydrology, v. 79, no. 3/4, p. 375-388. <br />Chow, V.T., 1959, Open-channel hydraulics: New York, <br />McGraw-Hill, 680 p. <br />Coon, W.F., 1995, Estimates of roughness coefficients <br />for selected natural stream channels with vegetated <br />banks in New York: U.S. Geological Survey <br />Open-File Report 93-161,127 p. <br />Costa, lE., 1987, A comparison of the largest <br />rainfall-runoff floods in the United States with those <br />of the People's Republic of China and the world: <br />Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Journal of <br />Hydrology, v. 96, p. 101-115. <br />Cowan, W.L., 1956, Estimating hydraulic roughness <br />coefficients: Agricultural Engineering, v. 37, no. 7, <br />p.473-475. <br />Dalrymple, Tate, and Benson, M.A., 1967, Measurement <br />of peak discharge by the slope-area method: U.S. <br />Geological Survey, Techniques of Water Resources <br />Investigations, book 3, chap. A2, 12 p. <br />Davidian, Jacob, and Cahal, D.1., 1963, Distribution of <br />shear in rectangular channels: U.S. Geological <br />Survey Professional Paper 475-C, p. C206-C208. <br />Fathi-Maghadam, M., and Kouwen, N., 1997, Non-rigid, <br />non-submerged, vegetative roughness on <br />floodplains: American Society of Civil Engineers, <br />Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, v. 123, no. 1, <br />p.51-57. <br />Garrett, J.M., and Gellenbeck, D.J., 1991, Basin <br />characteristics and streamflow statistics in Arizona <br />as of 1989: U.S. Geological Survey Water- <br />Resources Investigations Report 91-4041, 612 p. <br />Hirschboeck, K.K., 1985, Hydroclimatology of flow <br />events in the Gila River basin, central and southern <br /> <br />Summary 27 <br />