Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />'J..'J j;JiccU .L;'e~uii::i an:: inundated gardens, f!ouut:u. Utlsements t CiuE;l::)t:U se\V..::iS, cl.l.l."'-:' <br /> <br />damage to surrounding fields from excess mud and water. While Sulphur Creek <br /> <br />did not overflow its banks during the storm 0~Jul~_18,_ 1976, the shallow flooding <br /> <br />which occurred in Meeker following that intense storm is typical of historic flooding <br /> <br />problems experienced by the town. <br /> <br />No loss of life has been attributed to floods in Meeker. <br /> <br />V. HYDROLOGY <br /> <br />Data used in t!1e study was obtained from the fol1owin~ ~ources~ <br /> <br />1. \,. Stream gaging records, U.S . Geological Survey, Water Resources Division. <br /> <br />2. v "Precipitation Frequency Atlas of Western U. S. Volume III, Colorado" <br />National Weather Service. <br /> <br />> <br />3. "Rangely, Colorado; Flood Insurance Study Hydrology" Sacramento /..- <br />District Corps of En~neers. <br /> <br />I <br />4. ... "Sulphur Creek through Meeker". White River: Soil Conservation <br /> <br />District, U.S.D .A. Soil Conservation Service. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />5. y "Flood Prone Area Maps" U. S. Geological Survey, Water Resources <br />Division. <br /> <br />Reference 4 is a report outlining peak flows for 10 year, 25 year, and 50 year <br /> <br />floods on Sulphur Creek through Meeker and potential problems associated with <br /> <br />flooding on Sulphur Creek. It does not include water surface profiles for the channel. <br /> <br />Reference 5 is 7-1/2 minute quadrangle sheets with 100 year flood outlines prepared <br /> <br />by the Geological Survey from regional stage-frequency relations. Figure 3 shows <br />, - <br /> <br />locations and periods of record for stream gages in the White River watershed. <br /> <br />6 <br />