Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ft ;~ not known how many flood insurance policies are in effect in the Dry Creek <br />flood plain. It is also difficult to predict the rate at whieh existing structures would be <br />insured in the future, A total of 471 structures would be removed from the lOO-year <br />flood plain if the JOO-year plan were constnlcted, To the extent these structures are <br />clIrrently insured or will be insured in the future, an economic bendit wOl.lld resl.llt; <br />however, thisbenef1t has not been quantified. <br /> <br />BESEFlT-COST RATIO <br /> <br />Table 6-4 contains an economic slImmary of both plans. As shown, tile total eco- <br />nomic cost for the lOO-year plan would be $6,171,700. The annl.lal cost would be <br />$519,300. Estimatedannllal benefits would beS444,200, ri:sultinginabencflt-costratio <br />of 0.86. This plan wOllld have netannllal bencfitsof.$75,lOO. <br /> <br />~REASEn RECREATION OPPORTU~ITlF.s <br />The possibility e:dsts for using the potential diversion channel for recreational <br />purposes. Thc most likely use would be for a trail connecting with the POlldre TraiL <br />This potential benefit and its associated cost have not been quantiflcd. <br /> <br />As shown on table 6-4, the total economic cost for the 30-year plan would be <br />$3,642,800. The annual cost would be $305,600. Estimated annllal benefits wOllld be <br />$370,200, resulting in a bencfit-cost ratio of 1.2. This plan would have net annual <br />bencfitsof$64,600. <br /> <br />LA:'o'J) V ALUf, ~:NIIA~CEMENT <br />Removing lan<J from the flood plain and floodway would increase its value, To <br />the exlcnt this incrcase is rc1atcd to the more efficicntutilization ofr esourees. itcolllJ <br />bccons;deredaprojcctbenefit. This potcnlial bc[\efit has not bee[\ quantified. <br /> <br />RISK AND UNCERTAINTY <br /> <br />Statistics that can be described by pr\lbability distributions can bc J,--alt with <br />through risk analysis. Uncertainty deals with phenomenon thatcannOl be descrihed by <br />a probability distribution, <br /> <br />ECONO\1IC COSTS <br /> <br />F.conomic costs consist of the first cost, interelt during construction (!DCl,and <br />operation an<J maintenance (O&M) costs. The first cost inclllJes tile costs reqllirw to <br />eOl\struct the projcct. including costs for design and administra tion,landacquisition,and <br />relocation costs, IDC il delcrmincdusing tilc Federal discount rate and considers the <br />amount of fund, l1'quircd and the length of time for construction, O&M costs are the <br />estimated annual costs of opcrating and maintaining the project. 0&/1.1 C<.lsts arc csti- <br />matcJ tu bc $5.000 p.::r year for tile 30)'e.1r ;11a.1 and $10,000 for the IOO-ycar plan. <br /> <br />In thc analysis oflhe estimate of the flO(l(j damages, errors could be prescnt in tile <br />estimatcdvalucs, hydraulics, land useclevat;ons, and hydrology, The uncertainity in the <br />Airpark area may be of significant importance. The feasibility study involves morc <br />detailed analysis and dalll col!oction that attempts to re<:!lIce many ofthcsc uncertainitics. <br /> <br />Some degrec of risk and uncertainty is present in any wmerresourc e plan because <br />of data Hmitationsoroth,'rrcaS<lns. There are many factors that inflllence the basic data <br />which, in hml, influence the reliability of the study conclusions, [n thc Fort Collins <br />llrca, there arc three factors which involve a certain degree of uncertainty: (I) there is <br />no strel\m gage data for Dry Creek. (2) the n1l1l1erous irrigation canals that cross Dry <br /> <br />6-17 <br /> <br />6.18 <br />