My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01242
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01242
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 10:39:42 AM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:52:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Title
Hydraulic Design of Improved Inlets for Culverts
Date
9/1/1981
Prepared For
USDOT
Prepared By
Federal Highway Administration
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />,- <br />y <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />, <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />For the side-tapered inlet, there are two possible control <br />sections: the face and the throat. Hf' as shown in Figure 5, <br />is the headwater depth based upon face control. Ht is the head- <br />water depth based upon throat control. <br /> <br />The advantages of a side-tapered inlet operating in throat <br />control are: The flow contraction at the throat is reduced; and, <br />for a given pool elevation, more head is applied at the throat <br />control section. The latter advantage is increased by utilizing <br />a slope-tapered inlet or a depression in front of the side-tapered <br />inlet. <br /> <br />Slope-Tapered Inlets <br /> <br />A slope-tapered inlet is the third degree of improvement. Its <br />advantage over the side-tapered inlet without a depression is that <br />more head is available at the control (throat) section. This is <br />accomplished by incorporating a FALL in the enclosed entrance <br />section (Figure 6). <br /> <br />This inlet can have over 100 percent greater capacity than a <br />conventional culvert with square edges. The degree of increased <br />capacity depends largely upon the amount of FALL available between <br />the invert at the face and the invert at the throat section. Since <br />this FALL may vary, a range of increased capacities is possible. <br /> <br />Slope-tapered inlets of alternate designs were considered and <br />tested during the research. The inlet shown in Figure 6 is recommended <br />on the basis of its hydraulic performance and ease of construction. <br />As a result of the FALL concentrated between the face and the throat <br />of this inlet, the barrel slope is flatter than the barrel slope of a <br />conventional or side-tapered structure at the same site. <br /> <br />Both the face and throat are possible control sections in a <br />slope-tapered inlet culvert. However, since the major cost of a <br />culvert is in the barrel portion and not the inlet structure, the <br />inlet face should be designed with a greater capacity at the allowable <br />headwater elevation than the throat. This insures that flow control <br />will be at the throat and more of the potential capacity of the barrel <br />will be utilized. <br /> <br />Performance Curves <br /> <br />To understand how a culvert at a particular site will function <br />over a range of discharges, a performance curve, which is a plot of <br />discharge versus headwater depth or elevation, must be drawn. Figure <br />7 is a schematic performance curve for a culvert with either a <br />side-tapered or slope-tapered inlet. <br /> <br />13-13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.