Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Future Condition - Additional Ground-water Development <br /> <br />An analysis was also made which simul ates the effects of additional <br />ground-water development in Nebraska. This future condition includes <br />the operation of Grayrocks Reservoir and the 1977 present condition <br />flows below Guernsey and at Julesburg. Table 14 presents the estimated <br />monthly flow conditions. <br /> <br />Growth of irrigated agriculture would occur in Nebraska under this con- <br />dition due to continued ground-water development. This has a signifi- <br />cant depletionary effect on surface flows in Nebraska. <br /> <br />The finite difference model developed to simulate the approximate <br />effects of present ground-water irrigation development on the flows of <br />the Pl atte River in Nebraska was also used to simul ate flow conditions <br />that may be expected to occur with additional ground-water development. <br /> <br />Under the future condition it is assumed that all of the irrigable <br />1 and having access to a ground-water supply would be developed over the <br />next 50 years. This would indicate that a total of 3.2 million acres <br />could be irrigated from ground-water suppl ies with a net pumpage of <br />2.6 mi II ion acre-feet per year. Therefore, there woul d be an increase <br />of 1. 8 mi 11 ion acres wh i ch woul d be added to the present i rri gated <br />acreage at a rate of 2 percent per year. <br /> <br />Results indicate that streamflow depletions would be 568,000 acre-feet <br />per year, or 384,000 acre-feet per year greater than at present. <br />Ground-water storage ,woul d be depl eted at a rate of 1. 9 mill ion acre- <br />feet per year. In addition, some 357,000 acres of subirrigated land <br />would be lost, resulting in the salvage of 473,000 acre-feet of water <br />per year. <br /> <br />Using the Platte River at Overton as an example, the annual flows <br />are reduced by about 20 percent of the flows depicted in the future <br />condition without additional ground-water development. At Grand Island, <br />the reduction is 25 percent. <br /> <br />54 <br />