My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01191
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01191
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 10:39:36 AM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:50:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Title
Laboratory Data on Course-Sediment Transport for Bedload-Sampler Calibrations
Date
1/1/1987
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Because of the numerous size analyses and wet-sieve <br />separations that were made of samples collected with the test <br />samplers, no size information is presented in this report in <br />tabular fonn. However, defined analysis data and assigned <br />percent-finer values for all samples are stored on magnetic <br />media in the SAMPDA T A file for each run (see table 3 for <br />complete data-file names). These data are available on re- <br />quest (see Availability of Data, inside back cover). <br /> <br />Water Discharge <br /> <br />The constant water discharge established for each run <br />was attained during an adjuslment period at the beginning of <br />each run by varying the heighl of Ihe weir at the end of the <br />flume and the opening of the sluice gate at the upper end of <br />the flume 10 achieve the desired flow depth and bedload- <br />transport rate. Sufficient time was allowed belween signifi- <br />cant adjustments for the bed slope to change and reach a <br />quasi-equilibrium stale. After desired transport and depth <br />states were established and the data-collection period was in <br />progress, the sluice gate and weir settings remained nomi- <br />nally fixed, except during startup at the beginning of each <br />day and shutdown at the end of each day. However, during <br />most runs, the sluice gate had to be adjusted slightly now <br />and then to compensate for changes in river elevation at the <br />intake structure, and during several runs, weir height had to <br />be adjusted to maintain a reasonably constanl flow depth and <br />bedload-transport rate. <br />The water-surface elevation at a point about 25 ft <br />upstream from the weir was continuously monitored by an <br />electronic water. stage recorder mounted over a stilling well <br />on the outside wall of the flume. The recorder's voltage <br />output, which is proportional to water-surface elevation, <br />was graphed continuously by a strip-chart recorder. Period- <br />ically during each run, oulput voltages were read directly <br />from the recorder and noted on the slrip-chart record to <br />provide adjustment factors for correcting the pen trace. <br />The relation belween stage (water-surface elevation) <br />and discharge was eSlablished Ihrough calibrations based on <br />measurements of the flow volume accumulated during peri- <br />ods of several minutes. Six sets of calibration data were <br />collected during the course of run sequences with the four <br />different bed materials. For each set, a series of discharges <br />was established by sequentially adjusting the sluice-gate <br />opening. For each discharge, voltages from the stage <br />recorder were read and recorded both manually and via a <br />strip-chart recorder while flow was accumulated to near the <br />top of one of two 15,000-ft3 tanks outside of the laboratory. <br />The mean flow rate for each gate setting was detennined <br />from the measured volume and time of accumulation. <br />Analysis of the sets of calibration data indicated that <br />discharge varied with stage, weir height, and thickness of <br />bed material in the flume. The dimensionless weir discharge <br />coefficient, Cd' is plotted in figure 21 against the ratio of the <br /> <br />head on the weir, h, to height of the weir crest above the <br />channel bottom, W, for each set of calibration data. The <br />discharge coefficient was computed from: <br /> <br />Q = 2/3 Cd b hV2i/z <br /> <br />(I) <br /> <br />where Q is discharge, <br />b is the channel width, and <br />g is the gravity constant. <br />Also shown in figure 21 are linear regression lines that <br />represent each set of calibration data. Although the slopes of <br />all lines are not precisely the same, they are sufficiently <br />close that a single slope of 0.1534 can be used to character. <br />ize all data sets. By averaging the intercept values of lines <br />having a slope of 0.1534 that pass through each point of a <br />data set, an overall intercept was established for each data <br />set. The average intercept values plotted against H b' the <br />height of the bed surface above the flume floor, are pre. <br />sented in figure 22. Values of Hb for both the calibrations <br />and the individual runs were detennined by deducting the <br />mean depth of flow from the difference between the mean <br />waler-surface elevation at station 20 (upstream from the <br />slot) and the elevation of the flume floor. <br />Differences belween discharges measured during the <br />calibrations and counterpart discharges computed using the <br />relations depicted in figures 21 and 22 average 0.06 percent <br />and have a standard deviation of 0.81 percent. Mean water <br />discharges for each run listed in table 5 are believed to be <br />within about 2 percent of the true mean discharge. <br /> <br />Water-Surface Slope <br /> <br />Water. surface elevations were measured by using <br />manometers. A series of nine piezometer tubes that con- <br />nected to a common manometer board extended upstream <br />from the bedload trap (station 0) and tenninated in screened <br />outlets that were cemented along the centerline of the hori- <br />zontal flume floor every 20 ft from station 20 to station 180. <br />Bed material covered the outlets. All manometers were read <br />simultaneously at intervals throughout each run. The num- <br />ber of sets of readings thai were used to compute the average <br />water-surface slope for each run is listed in column 3 of <br />table 7. Many, but not all, of the sets of readings were <br />obtained concurrently with longitudinal streambed-surface <br />elevation profiles to facilitate computations of total depth. <br />Because of (I) the relatively deep depths and high <br />flow velocities attendant in many of the runs, (2) the pres- <br />ence of vertical struts at the slot (station 0), and (3) flow <br />expansion due to the absence of bed material downstream <br />from the slot, water-surface slopes were not unifonn <br />throughout the length of the flume. To exclude data obtained <br />from parts of the channel where slopes were not uniform, <br />water-surface elevations were subjected to statistical analy- <br />sis. For each run, every set of water-surface elevations was <br />used to detennine the water-surface slope for a base reach <br /> <br />20 Laboratory Data on Coarse-Sediment Transport for Bedload-Sampler Calibrations <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.