My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01191
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01191
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 10:39:36 AM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:50:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Title
Laboratory Data on Course-Sediment Transport for Bedload-Sampler Calibrations
Date
1/1/1987
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />w <br />~ <br />a: <br />o <br />w <br />~ <br />u <br />is <br />~ <br />VI <br />'" <br />w <br />~ <br />a: <br />u. <br />o <br />z <br />o 0.2 <br />i= <br />U <br /><( <br />a: <br />u. <br /> <br />'.0 <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br />0.8 <br /> <br />06 <br /> <br /> <br />EXPLANATION <br /> <br />0.4 <br /> <br />- - - - - Run 3, 2.1-mm bed material <br />- - - - - - - Run 3, 6.5-mm bed material <br />Run " 19.9-mm bed material <br /> <br />0.0 <br />0.0 0.5 1.0 <br /> <br />1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 <br /> <br />TRANSPORT RATE. IN POUNDS PER SECOND PER FOOT <br /> <br />Figure 11. Cumulalive relalive-frequency distribution of <br />bedload-transport rates from samples collected wilh Helley- <br />Smith sampler no. 1. <br /> <br />The 6.5-mm material consisted of particles from a <br />roofing-gravel mixture that had passed through an 8.0-mm, <br />square.mesh screen. The 2.I-mm material was derived from <br />No. 10 washed filter rock and was composed of particles <br />that were retained by a 1.5-mm, square. mesh screen but <br />which passed through a 2.5- by 6.4-mm, rectangular-mesh <br />screen. Particles from a coarse gravel mixture that were <br />retained by a 12.7-mm, square-mesh screen, but which <br /> <br />w <br />~ <br />a: <br />o <br />w <br />>- <br /><( <br />u <br />is <br />~ <br />VI <br />'" <br />w <br />~ <br />a: <br />u. <br />o <br />z <br />o <br />i= <br />u <br /><( <br />a: <br />u. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />1.0 <br /> <br />0.8 <br /> <br />0.6 <br /> <br /> <br />EXPLANATION <br /> <br />0.4 <br /> <br />0.2 <br /> <br />- - - - - Run 3 2 l-mm bed material <br />- - - - - - - Run 3: 6:5-mm bed material <br />Run 1, 19.9-mm bed material <br /> <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br /> <br />1.5 <br /> <br />2.0 <br /> <br />2.5 <br /> <br />05 <br /> <br />1.0 <br /> <br />TRANSPORT RATE. IN POUNDS PER SECOND PER FOOT <br /> <br />Figure 12. Cumulative relative-frequency distribution of <br />bedload-transport rates from samples collected with Helley- <br />Smith sampler no. 2. <br /> <br />w <br />~ <br />a: <br />o <br />w <br />>- <br /><( <br />u <br />is <br />~ <br />VI <br />'" <br />w <br />>- <br /><( <br />a: <br />u. <br />o <br />z <br />o <br />~ 0.2 <br />U <br /><( <br />a: <br />u. <br /> <br />'.0 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />08 I <br /> <br /> <br />0.61 <br />I <br />I <br />0.4 <br /> <br /> <br />EXPLANATION <br /> <br />- - - - - Run 3, 2.1-mm bed material <br />- - - - - - - Run 3, 6.5-mm bed material <br />Aun " 19.9-mm bed material <br /> <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br /> <br />1.0 <br /> <br />2.0 <br /> <br />'.0 <br /> <br />4.0 <br /> <br />TRANSPORT RATE. IN POUNDS PER SECOND PER FOOT <br /> <br />Figure 13. Cumulative relative-frequency distribution of <br />bedload-Iran sport rales from samples collecled with Helley- <br />Smilh sampler no. 3. <br /> <br />passed through a 32.0-mm, square-mesh screen, com- <br />posed the 23.5-mm bed material. The bed-material mixture <br />was produced by combining particles removed from the <br />flume after the sixth run with 6.5-mm material and after the <br />fifth run with 23.5.mm material, together with 2.I.mm <br />material that had been prepared but never used; the propor- <br />tions of the mix, by volume, were 11, 3, and 4, respec- <br />tively. <br /> <br />w <br />~ <br />a: <br />o <br />w <br />~ <br />u <br />is <br />Z <br />VI <br />'" <br />w <br />~ <br />a: <br />u. <br />o <br />z <br />o <br />G <br /><( <br />a: <br />u. <br /> <br />'.0 <br /> <br />1.0 <br />/ <br /> <br /> <br />0.81 <br /> <br /> <br />0.6 <br /> <br />0.4 <br /> <br />EXPLANATION <br /> <br />0.2 <br /> <br />- Run 3. 2.1-mm bed material <br />_ _ - - - - - Run 3. 6.5-mm bed material <br />Run " 19.9-mm bed material <br /> <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br /> <br />'.0 <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />5.0 <br /> <br />'.0 <br /> <br />2.0 <br /> <br />TRANSPORT RATE, IN POUNDS PER SECOND PER FOOT <br /> <br />Figure 14. Cumulalive relalive-frequency dislribulion of <br />bedload-transport rates from samples collected with Helley- <br />Smith sampler no. 4. <br /> <br />Hydraulic and Sedimentologic Data 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.