My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01161
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01161
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:58:23 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:49:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
289
County
Douglas
Community
Larkspur
Title
Flood Insurance Study - Larkspur, Douglas County, Colorado
Date
9/1/1987
Designation Date
12/1/1987
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />maps of Douglas County, Colorado (References 9 and 4, respecti- <br />vely). Values of 10-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year peak discharges <br />were obtained using the TR-20 computer program, developed by the <br />SCS (Reference 10). The computed peak discharges compare favorably <br />with the peak discharges estimated using USGS Technical Manual No. <br />1 (Reference 11). <br /> <br />Peak discharge-drainage area relationships for East Plum Creek are <br />shown in Table 1. <br /> <br />3.2 Hydraulic Analyses <br /> <br />Analyses of the hydraulic characteristics of flooding from the <br />sources studied were carried out to provide estimates of the eleva- <br />tions of floods of the selected recurrence intervals. <br /> <br />For East Plum Creek, the water-surface profiles for the 10-, 50-, <br />100-, and 500-year floods were developed using the SCS WSP-2 computer <br />program (Reference 12). These profiles and elevations were compared <br />with historic floods, and then the flood stages were determined. <br /> <br />Cross section data were obtained by field measurements. All bridges, <br />culverts, and other structures were surveyed to obtain elevation <br />data and structural geometry. <br /> <br />Locations of selected cross sections used in the hydraulic analyses <br />are shown on the Flood Profiles (Exhibit 1). For stream segments <br />for which a floodway was computed (Section 4.2), selected cross <br />section locations are also shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map <br />(Exhibit 2). <br /> <br />Roughness coefficients (Manning's On") were estimated by field <br />investigation and from pictures of the stream and its flood plain <br />using Rouqhness Characteristics of Natural Channels (Reference 13), <br />Open-Channel Hydraulics (Reference 14), and Handbook of Applied <br />Hydraulics (Reference 15). The On" values for East Plum Creek <br />ranged from 0.03 to 0.06 in the main channel and from 0.04 to 0.12 <br />for the overbanks. <br /> <br />For East Plum Creek, the starting water-surface elevation was deter- <br />mined using the stream slope at a starting valley cross section. <br /> <br />The hydraulic analyses for this study were based on unobstructed <br />flow. The flood elevations shown on the profiles are thus con- <br />sidered valid only if hydraulic structures remain unobstructed, <br />operate properly, and do not fail. <br /> <br />The methods used in estimated elevations of streams studied by <br />approximate methods came from USGS Technical Manual No. 1 (Refer- <br />ence 11). This manual has curves of drainage area-versus-discharge <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.