Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Dolores River <br /> <br />Wa':er-surface elevations were t:hen computed using the latest <br />version of the Corps HEC-2 step-backwater computer program <br />(Version 4.6.2, dated May 1991). Ute basic input data were that <br />used in the FEMA and Flood Hazard Information Report studies and <br />obtained through FEMA headquarters in Washington, D.C., and the <br />Corps Sacramento District. These data contained cross sections <br />upstream and downstream of the abovE!-mentioned newly surveyed <br />cross s'~ctions (as well as basic information such as reach <br />lengths and other coincide with those of the 1989 FEMA study and <br />the 197il Flood Hazard Information Report study. The cross- <br />section locations are shown on Attachments 2 and 3. The <br />hydraulic analysis consisted of th,; following: <br /> <br />- Develop the computer model. <br />- Update and run the model using current information. <br />- 'lary "n" values in the model to determine sensitivity. <br />- Revise the model to reflect potential project conditions. <br /> <br />Th,~ original FEMA(Flood Hazard Information study data were <br />used to create an executable computE!r file. All the data were <br />entered exactly as originally writtE!ll, including the old cross <br />section,;, flows, etc. The file was then run and debugged until <br />it compared closely with the original output for the 100-year <br />water-surface profile. The few remaining differences were due to <br />changes made to the HEC-2 program it:self (the original FEMA model <br />being run with an August 1977 version of the program). 'I'he HEC-2 <br />file (input and output), identified a!l "OLDDOL.OUT," is included <br />in Appendix B. <br /> <br />Th,~ computer model was then r,;vised to incorporate current <br />informa':ion, including the new survey data referenced earlier and <br />adjustm,mts to channel flows based on the levees which have been <br />constru,~ted. A few old cross sections (Nos. 1, 5, 6, and 8) at <br />the dO~lstream end are no longer applicable because of the USBR <br />project and were dropped from the lnodel. Several other cross <br />section:; were revised to reflect thE! fill placed by the tTSBR <br />below 4':h Street. Also, it appears that with the higher banks <br />and lev'~es, most of the overbank flow intI) Dolores would be just <br />upstream of the bend in the river, south of the high school (at <br />cross s'~ction 19). Once the flow is out of bank at this <br />location, it is hydraulically cutoff from the channel flow until <br />it reaches the reservoir (unless the levees were to fail or be <br />overtopped) . <br /> <br />Th,~ resulting new water-surface profile is shown (along with <br />the old FEMA(Flood Hazard Information Report profile) on <br />Attachm,mt 4. The HEC-2 file is included as "NEWDOL4. Ou'l'" in <br />Appendi:( B. The old and new profilEls compare very closely, <br />suggesting that the original modeling accounted quite well for <br />the eff'~cts of the McPhee Reservoir and levees. Therefore, there <br /> <br />5 <br />