My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01124
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01124
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:58:24 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:47:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Boulder
Stream Name
South Boulder Creek
Title
South Boulder Creek/ Flatirons
Date
12/5/1997
Prepared For
Boulder
Prepared By
Consultants
Floodplain - Doc Type
Community File
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ University of Colorado at alder <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />RECEIVED <br />JUN 1 2 1997 <br /> <br />Business Services <br /> <br />Colorado Water <br />ConservFlrion Rn~1'd <br /> <br />Telecommunications Center <br />Campus Box 317 <br />Boulder, Colorado 80309-0317 <br />(303) 492,1525 <br />Fax: (303) 492-5105 <br /> <br />June 10, 1997 <br /> <br />Lany Lang <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />1313 Sherman Street, Suite 721 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br /> <br />RE: Flood Control Dike Around University of Colorado Property <br /> <br />Dear Larry: <br /> <br />As I believe you are aware, the University of Colorado, through its agents, is seeking from the <br />Division of Minerals and Geology a technical revision to the present reclamation plan to raise a <br />portion of the flood control dike so that all of the dike is at least four feet above the base flood <br />elevation. In connection with that effort, the University would appreciate a letter from you, giving <br />your opinion on the following subjects: <br /> <br />1. \\Thether the dike should remain in place, and, if so, whether the lower portions of the <br />dike should be raised to a level at least four feet above the base flood leveL <br /> <br />2. Whether the dike currently offers flood protection benefit to the residences to the <br />north of the property. <br /> <br />3. Whether you support FEMA recognition of the dike for FEMA mapping purposes. <br /> <br />Inasmuch as we have a hearing before the MLRB on June 26, 1997, and relevant documents must be <br />submitted by June 13,1997, we would greatly appreciate your prompt assistauce. Please send your <br />letter to the Mined Land Reclamation Board referencing File No. M,81,302 and to Bruce Humphries <br />at the Division (with a copy to me). <br /> <br />Thank you for your assistance. <br /> <br />Very truly ~ 1 --.. <br /> <br />"/Ii;,,,," <br /> <br />Director, Business Services <br /> <br />cc: Chancellor Byyny <br />Charles Sweet <br />Gary Woods <br />David Packard <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.