Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The selected alternative plan is a combination of selected structural improve- <br /> <br /> <br />ments, major conduit, channelization, and detention. The selected alternative plan <br /> <br /> <br />for the various reaches is presented below: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Reach-A - Storm sewer, (S-year protection with installation of Reach-D <br />improvements) . <br /> <br />The Present Worth (P.W.) is the present sum of the series of average annual <br /> <br /> <br />costs (AVG ANN) over the project life accounting for the time value of the money, <br /> <br /> <br />Based upon 1983 costs, 8.S7. interest rate, and a 50-year project life of a project, <br /> <br />the present worth of the potential flood damages is $8,687,000. The implementation <br /> <br /> <br />of the selected alternative will cost $3,911,SOO and will result in benefits of <br /> <br /> <br />$7,8S7,700. The benefit-cost ratio will be 2: I. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Reach-B - Channelization, (S-year protection with installation of Reach-D <br />improvements) . <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Reach-C - Storm sewer, (S-year protection with installation of Reach-D <br />improvements). <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Reach-D - Selected structural and detention (Caley Detention Dam). <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Reach-E - Storm sewer, (S-year protection). <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />A summary of the benefits and costs for the selected plan is presented in the <br /> <br /> <br />following table by political jurisdiction. The DAMAGES listed are the total damages <br /> <br /> <br />for the status quo drainageway condition. The costs associated with the recommended <br /> <br />alternative is listed under IMPROVEMENT COST, and the potential damages remaining <br /> <br /> <br />after implementation of the plan are listed under RESIDUAL DAMAGES. The benefits <br /> <br /> <br />derived from the selected plan are presented under BENEFITS. The NET BENEFITS <br /> <br /> <br />derived from the selected alternative plan is the difference between the BENEFITS <br /> <br />and the IMPROVEMENTS COST. The TOTAL ANNUAL COSTS are the sum of IMPROVEMENT COST <br /> <br /> <br />and RESIDUAL DAMAGES. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />BENEFIT/COST COMPARISON <br />SELECTED ALTERNATIVE PLAN <br />(1000 DOLLARS) <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />DAMAGES <br />AVG <br />JURISDICTION ANN P.W. <br />Littleton 585.9 6.776.3 <br /> <br />Arapahoe 165.2 1.910.1 <br />County <br /> <br /> TOTAL ANNUAL <br />niP. COST RES, OAK. BENEFITS NET BENEFITS COSTS <br />AVG AVG AVG AVG AVG <br />ANN P.W. ANN P.W. ANN P.W, ANN P,W, ANN P.W. <br />130.1 1.504.7 6~.1 7~2.9 ~20.8 6,023.4 390.7 4,~18.7 19~.2 2,2H.6 <br />176,3 2,039.0 6,6 76.4 1~8.6 1,834.3 -49.~ -~72.~ 214.7 2,483.2 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />TOTAL <br /> <br />7~I,1 8,687.0 338.2 3,911.~ 71.7 829.3 679.4 7,8~7.7 341.2 3,946.2 409.9 4.740.8 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />ix <br /> <br />x <br />