Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />(a) Drainage Improvements <br /> <br />(b) Utility Relocation <br /> <br /> <br />(c) Contingency <br /> <br /> <br />(d) Site Acquisition <br /> <br /> <br />(e) Engineering and Construction <br /> <br /> <br />(f) Operation and Maintenance <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The improvement costs were then used to update the benefit-cost analysis of the <br /> <br /> <br />Phase-A study. A summary of the benefit-cost analysis is presented in Table V-2. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />D. Plan Implementation <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Priorities of construction have been based upon the damage frequency, net bene- <br /> <br /> <br />fits, and other priorities established by the municipality. Normally, improvements <br /> <br /> <br />for each reach are relatively independent of one another. The IOO-year detention <br /> <br /> <br />facility in Reach-D will greatly impact all reaches below. However, the detention <br /> <br /> <br />is not the highest priority since most of the benefits (to other reaches) occur <br /> <br /> <br />at the lower frequency storms. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The priority of construction, discussed ,n detail in Chapter V, is shown below: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1. Storm sewer - Reach-A <br /> <br /> <br />2. IOO-year detention - Reach-D <br /> <br /> <br />3. Denver Highline Canal spill structure - Reach-D <br /> <br /> <br />4. Storm sewer - Reach-E <br /> <br /> <br />5. Storm sewer - Reach-C <br /> <br /> <br />6. Channel - Reach-B <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />-43- <br />