Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The storm sewers were generally placed with a minimum cover of 2-feet to <br /> <br />minimize the traffic loading impacts on the pipe. Storm sewer sizes and <br /> <br /> <br />locations were also determined, in part, to minimally impact existing utili- <br /> <br /> <br />ties and to utilize existing storm sewer facilities where practical. <br /> <br />3. DENVER HIGHLINE CANAL SPILL STRUCTURE <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Capacity of inlets were determined from the Criteria Manual. Storm sewer <br /> <br /> <br />inlets were sized based upon the Colorado Department of Highways type-R curb <br /> <br /> <br />opening inlets with 6-inch throat and 5-, 10-, and 15-foot lengths. The capa- <br /> <br /> <br />city of the inlet depended upon whether the inlet was in a sump or on-grade <br /> <br /> <br />condition. For inlets on-grade, the design capacity was also based upon the <br /> <br /> <br />estimated street grade. Typical values of design capacity used for preliminary <br /> <br /> <br />design are listed in the following table: <br /> <br />The criteria for the design of this structure was based upon the Denver <br /> <br />Highline Canal Master Plan (Reference-8). The spillway was designed to dis- <br /> <br /> <br />charge 550 cis under 100-year flood conditions. The crest elevation has been set <br /> <br /> <br />I.I-feet above the water surface at the base flow discharge of 200 cfs. The <br /> <br /> <br />crest should be concrete and have cut-off walls for erosion protection. Addi- <br /> <br />tionally, the crest should be designed so as not to restrict access along the <br /> <br /> <br />canal road. Adequate protection upstream and downstream of the crest should <br /> <br /> <br />also be provided. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />4 . OPEN CHANNEL <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> INLET SIZE CONDITION CAPACITY <br /> 5 L.F. Sump 4.0 <br /> 10 L.F. Sump 8.0 <br /> 15 L.F. Sump 12.0 <br /> 5 L.F. On-Grade 3,0 <br /> 10 LoF. On-Grade 5.5 <br /> 15 L.F. On-Grade 7.0 <br />2. CALEY DETENTION FACILITY <br /> <br />Design of the channel in Reach-B was based upon conveying the upstream <br /> <br />storm sewer flow to the downstream storm sewer reach. Using a Manning "n" of <br /> <br /> <br />.028, the 100-year channel velocities were limited to 7.0-feet per second. <br /> <br /> <br />The concrete channel bottom should be a minimum of 5.0-feet wide and the grass- <br /> <br /> <br />lined channel side slopes should be 4: I maximum. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />C. Construction Sequence <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Caley detention was sized with a maximum embankment height less than 15- <br /> <br /> <br />feet and with the maximum depth at the emergency spillway less than 10-feet. <br /> <br /> <br />The final construction plans will therefore not require approval of the State <br /> <br />Engineer's Office (SED). However, due to the proximity to downstream residences, <br /> <br /> <br />the facility should be designed to meet SED criteria. The facility was planned <br /> <br /> <br />to take advantage of topographical conditions, land use, and multi-purpose <br /> <br /> <br />useage. The spillway width of 100-feet was sized for a storm intensity approx- <br /> <br /> <br />imately half way between a 100-year and PMP event. The design discharge is <br /> <br />2600 cfs compared to a peak 100-year inflow of 1010 cfs. The 4:1 embankment <br /> <br /> <br />slopes will improve the visual imapct and add to stability. The final design <br /> <br /> <br />should be coordinated with the South Suburban Metro Recreation and Park District <br /> <br /> <br />to assure the maximum recreational and flood protection benefits. <br /> <br />Improvements for Reaches-A, -B, and -C are somewhat dependent on the proposed <br /> <br /> <br />detention facility in Reach-D. Priority of construction can be related to the <br /> <br />damage frequency, net benefits, or other criteria established by the municipality. <br /> <br /> <br />Based upon these criteria and the fact that 80% of the total average annual damages <br /> <br /> <br />occur in Reach-A, the immediate priority should be construction of the proposed <br /> <br />storm sewer system in Reach-A. Without Caley detention. the proposed system would <br /> <br />be capable of handling a flood with a frequency of about 2-year. With construction <br /> <br /> <br />of the detention facility above Caley Avenue, the second priority, the capacity of <br /> <br /> <br />the storm sewer in a Reach-A will be increased to a 5-year frequency level. Con- <br /> <br />struction of Caley detention facility would also eliminate most of the flood damages <br /> <br /> <br />in Reach-C by intercepting all flooding from the drainage basin above. The outlet <br /> <br /> <br />pipe, beneath the dam would be constructed to discharge at street level. After the <br /> <br /> <br />storm sewer system 1S constructed along South Pennsylvania Avenue, the outlet works <br /> <br /> <br />can be modified to discharge directly into the storm sewer, thereby eliminating <br /> <br /> <br />discharges in the street. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />-33- <br /> <br />-34- <br />