Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />In order to determine the flood limits for such a flow, it was necessary to <br /> <br /> <br />evaluate the site hydrologic conditions. Through the various methods <br /> <br /> <br />described later in this report, peak flood rates were calculated at key <br /> <br />locations in the drainage basin. Hydraulic calculations were then <br /> <br />performed to determine the water surface profile and flooding limits <br /> <br />corresponding to these flow rates. Also, floodway limits were evaluated <br /> <br />and backwater flood plain limits and profiles were determined for tentative <br /> <br />culvert/embankment type road crossings. <br /> <br />II. DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />A. GENERAL <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The Spring Gulch drainage basin consists of approximately 2.058 square <br /> <br />miles of undeveloped land in the northwest corner of Douglas County, <br /> <br />Colorado. Currently, the Gulch carries runoff following precipitation, but <br /> <br />it is normally dry. Further study is needed to determine if development <br /> <br />will cause more frequent runoff due to uybanization characteristics. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />B. COORDINATION <br /> <br />The basin originates at Section 22, Township 6 South, Range 68 West (see <br /> <br />Vicinity Map, Basin Boundary Map and Sheet Index (sheet 1 of 12 in <br /> <br /> <br />Appendix), and extends approximately 3.4 miles in a northwesterly direction <br /> <br />to its eventual outfall point at U.S. Highway 85. Development in this <br /> <br /> <br />basin will consist of single and multifamily residences with school sites <br /> <br /> <br />and nonurban use areas I and is expected to increase runoff rates over <br /> <br />existing condition flows. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Appropriate methodologies for perform lng the necessary analyses were <br />established through consultations with the Urban Drainage and Flood Control <br />District. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />C. METHODOLOGY <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The basic mapping is at 1 inch 40 feet scale with one,foot contours, and <br /> <br />subsequently reduced to 1 inch 200 feet scale for use in this report. <br /> <br /> <br />Land use data was obtained from the approved Development Plan for Highlands <br /> <br />Ranch. The Spring Gulch drainage basin was divided into 12 sub,basin <br /> <br /> <br />segments (see Basin Boundary Map), and peak discharges at the downstream <br /> <br /> <br />end of each of these sub-basins were determined using the Colorado Urban <br /> <br /> <br />Hydrograph Procedure (CUHP) in conjunction with the Storm Water Management <br /> <br />Model (SWMM). Water surface profiles and flood plain limits, as well as <br /> <br /> <br />floodway limits due to encroachments, were determined using the HEC,2 Water <br /> <br /> <br />Surface Profiles computer program. The reader should refer to the <br /> <br /> <br />following sections for greater detail on the hydrologic and hydraulic <br /> <br /> <br />analyses used and to the tables, figures and drawings included in the <br /> <br /> <br />Appendix of this report for the results of these analyses. <br /> <br />The drainage basin is contained wholly within Douglas County. Various <br />utility easements including those for the City of Aurora and the Denver <br />Water Board cross this drainage basin. Spring Gulch basin is contained <br />wholly within Urban Drainage and Flood Control District jurisdiction. This <br />report addresses only that portion of the drainage basin flood limits which <br />lie upstream of the Corps of Engineers embankment upstream of U.S. Highway <br />85. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />B. SPRING GULCH <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Spring Gulch basin consists of one major watercourse (reach). The extent <br /> <br /> <br />and relationship of this reach to the basin can best be seen on the <br /> <br /> <br />previously referenced Basin Boundary Map in the Appendix. The channels <br /> <br /> <br />delineated on this map vary considerably along their lengths in terms of <br /> <br /> <br />channel cross section, side slopes, stream bed (thalweg) slopes, roughness <br /> <br />and channel material. Detailed mapping in the Appendix (Sheets 1-6) has <br /> <br /> <br />been prepared for the hydraulic analyses of this major reach. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />I <br />