My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00961
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00961
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:21:18 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:40:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Larimer
Community
Fort Collins
Stream Name
Spring Creek
Title
Hydraulic Evaluation of the Centre Avenue Bridge at Spring Creek
Date
11/22/2000
Prepared For
Fort Collins
Prepared By
Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />III, PRE-PROJECT CONDITION ANALYSES <br /> <br />3.1 Duplicate Effective Hydrologic Model <br /> <br />As reported in the effective FIS [FEMA, 1996], discharges for Spring Creek were <br />computed using the V,S, Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Storm Water Management <br />Model (SWMM) based on a 2-hour storm duration, Rainfall information was taken from the 1973 <br />NOAA Atlas, The SWMM model utilized 97 subbasins, The level of urban development, and <br />corresponding percent impervious estimates for each subbasin were determined by field inspection <br />and were modeled for existing basin development for 1988, Individual flood hydrographs were <br />combined at various design points along each stream segment to determine peak discharges at <br />designated design points, Values for infiltration, overland roughness coefficients, and surface <br />storage depths recommended by the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) and <br />EPA were used for both pervious and impervious areas, The SWMM model accounted for the <br />effects of irrigation canals, detention ponds and inflow hydrographs into the Spring Creek Basin, <br />No modifications were made to the SWMM model as part of the current project. However, <br />the model was used to generate baseline operating conditions and inflow hydro graphs to the BNRR <br />detention pond for use in the EXTRAN model. Discussion and presentation of inflow hydrographs <br />to the BNRR pond is reserved for Section 4,\, <br />The effective SWMM model provided by the City was used to define pre-project condition <br />release rates through the BNRR embankment and water surface elevations in the BNRR detention <br />pond, The results of the model indicate a 100-year release of 1,465 cfs and a 100-year water <br />surface elevation of 4993.47 ft, NGVD, corresponding to a maximum storage volume of 202.4 <br />acre-feet. <br />The effective HEC-2 model for Spring Creek, obtained from the City of Fort Collins, <br />indicates a 100-year discharge of 1,465 cfs at Cross Section 16293, located directly downstream <br />of the BNRR, The 100-year water surface elevation imposed at Cross Section 16430 in the HEC- <br />2, located directly upstream of the BNRR, is 4993.47 ft, NGVD, From this comparison, it is <br />apparent that the results of the duplicate effective SWMM model match the discharge and water <br />surface elevations utilized in the effective HEC-2 model. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />3,2 Duplicate Effective Hydraulic Analyses <br /> <br />The effective HEC-2 floodplain and floodway models were provided by the City of Fort <br />Collins, As noted in the previous section, water surface elevations imposed in the HEC-2 models <br /> <br />T:',OPEN'cocsrtDl"cocsrfOl ft:ma-LO~IR tlnal-rpt.\\pd <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />ANdERSON CONsulTiNG ENGiNEERS, INL <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.