My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00947
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00947
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:42:33 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:39:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Eagle
Community
Eagle County
Stream Name
Roaring Fork, Frying Pan
Title
Floodplain Information Report Tech Add
Date
2/1/1978
Prepared For
Eagle County
Prepared By
Wright-McLaughlin Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />When comparing the 100-year water surface shown on the flooded area maps <br /> <br /> <br />(Sheets I through 9) with the HEC-2 computer data, there are several <br /> <br /> <br />obvious discrepancies which are noticeable. These discrepancies in the <br /> <br /> <br />results are discussed below. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Divided Flow. There are several sections throughout the flood plain <br /> <br /> <br />where divided flow occurs, but is not delineated on the flood plain mapping. <br /> <br /> <br />The HEC-2 computer program signifies divided flow wherever the ground sur- <br /> <br /> <br />face protrudes above the computed water surface, no matter how small. There <br /> <br />are several reasons why these protrusions may not have been delineated on <br /> <br /> <br />the flood plain mapping. <br /> <br />1. Small protrusions of land (berms) only a few feet in width may not <br />show up on the topographic maps, although the computer shows a <br />divided flow situation. <br /> <br />In many places the high spots that protrude above the water surface <br /> <br /> <br />were considered insignificant and therefore not plotted. <br /> <br /> <br />tlany areas where divided flow is indicated are in regions where <br /> <br /> <br />shallow overland flooding occurs. Since this flow is not hydrau- <br /> <br /> <br />lically connected to the main channel, these high spots were inun- <br /> <br /> <br />dated and therefore not plotted. <br /> <br /> <br />In some places there are road embankments or other types of berms <br /> <br /> <br />which contain the 100-year flood but the computer shows flow on <br /> <br /> <br />both sides of the embankment, giving rise to a divided flow <br /> <br /> <br />situation. <br /> <br /> <br />5. Some areas have drainage ditches whose inverts are below the <br /> <br />100-year flood level but do not receive flow due to the nature <br /> <br /> <br />of the topography. The computer shows these areas to be divided <br /> <br /> <br />flow situations. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Shallow Flooding Areas. Areas between stations 57+55 to 80+40 and 280+00 <br /> <br /> <br />to 300+60 are shown as regions of shallow overland flooding, These areas <br /> <br />represent sections where the flow has left the main channel and travelled <br /> <br /> <br />into overbank areas where it is not hydraul ically connected to the main <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.