My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00927
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00927
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:21:20 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:36:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
216
County
Logan
Community
Sterling
Stream Name
Sand Creek and Pawnee Creek Overflow
Title
Floodplain Information and Drainage Plan - Sand Creek and Pawnee Creek Overflow
Date
5/1/1983
Designation Date
7/1/1983
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I - <br /> -, <br /> e <br /> e <br />I e <br /> " <br /> ~ <br /> " <br /> . <br /> . <br />I " <br /> W <br /> e <br /> z <br /> < <br />) N ~ <br />- " <br />~ e <br /> m ~ <br /> < <br /> ~ ~ <br />I w <br /> " <br /> - <br /> " <br /> e <br /> " <br /> . <br />I w <br /> c <br /> " <br /> < <br /> " <br />I W <br /> ~ <br /> - <br /> e <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br /> <br /> , <br /> M <br /> .. <br /> '" <br /> " 0 0 <br /> 0 0 > . <br /> . 0_" 0 < M <br /> - - -~ 0 > - <br /> " ~ 0 < ~ <br /> 0 0 , . c , <br /> @ 0 . .ow . 0 .. <br /> . , 0" - " , <br /> 0 . . 0_" N ." . <br /> . , oe 0 ~ 0 <br /> .- W .. , .- <br /> . o~ 0 " <br /> " o. z 0 <br /> 0 0 z <br /> .. <br /> . <br /> e ee e e e 0 g e <br /> e e e ee 0 e e ~ e <br /> ~ e 0 Co e ~ e . e <br /> M . NN _ _ . . . ~ <br /> - N -- - - - - - - <br /> e N N eN N N N _ N e <br /> e N e e~ ~ ~ ~ 00 . . <br /> - . N .- N e - . N ~ <br /> - .0 0 . . . . <br />- <br /> - <br />- N e ee e 8 e . . e <br /> e 0 ~ ee e e e . cO <br /> U 0 0 , NM 0 N 00 e - N <br />~ M 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br /> , <br /> 0 <br />- <br />~ <br />. , N 0 co 0 0 0 e 0 e <br /> .. 0 , '0 . coo M ro ro m . N <br /> 0 N , . N ,N _ 0 . e - - <br />. NM _ _ _ . . . <br /> 0 <br /> , <br />.- <br /> - <br /> 0 <br />e N <br /> e - g~ e 0 e 0 e 0 <br /> - N m ~ N e e e , <br /> M 0 NOO . , 0 - N N <br /> - - - - <br /> , - e 8~ '0 0 0 00 0 0 <br /> . 0 N e 0 e e 0 <br /> - 0 N. . . . N . . <br /> .__.~-_._._- <br /> . <br /> - <br /> 0 N . . N N N 0 . 0 <br /> > 00 e . N 0 N e 0 N <br /> 0 . . <br /> " N - N . N 0 . . <br /> 0 _ M _ _ _ M _ <br /> 0 <br />0 <br />. - <br />. ON - . " 0 0 " 0 g e N <br />0 0 0 - . 0 0 . . . N <br />. 0.- > , , , , <br />_< 0 0 - - - <br />. - e <br />0 <br /> ----. - <br />. , , . , , , <br /> u co ee " 0 - N _ ee ee ee <br /> 0 Co .- 0 0 , , , M. ,M _e <br /> 0 N_ -- . 0 ~ 0 ~ _e ee ee <br />0 -- -- oW -- -- -- <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />- <br />" <br />o <br />o <br />- <br />- <br /> <br />. <br />.. <br />o <br />o <br />W <br />" <br />o <br />. <br />o <br />o <br /> <br />'- <br /> <br />" <br />u <br />" <br />> <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />u <br />o <br /> <br />.- <br /> <br />" <br />o <br />o <br />u <br />o <br />.. <br />- <br />~ <br />;;: <br />o <br />o <br />> <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />> <br />.. <br />. <br /> <br />> <br />-, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Irriqdtiol1llitches <br />Four ditch companies operdte Cdlldls which traverse the study area. <br />These include the; Springdale, SterlingNo.l,Pawnee, and Nort hSterling. <br />Approximate di tch ,,,pad tic$ .wc a~ f"llo,.'s: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Ditch <br />- <br /> <br />Capacity <br />(c.f.s.) <br />650 <br />300 <br />90 <br />200 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />North Sterling <br />Pawnee <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Sprlngdale <br />SterllngNo.l <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />All can be expected to carry water into and out of the area during floods. <br />Becau$e of the uncertainties of response of the 4 ditches, they were not <br />considered In the hydrologic analysis. All of the ditches have carried <br />water from the South Platte River during past flood events; there fore the <br />canal embankments are likely to fail even during relatively minor fl ooding. <br />Where a failure might occur is difficult to predict, and the effect of a <br />breach on the flood peak in a given watershed is likewise unpredictable. <br />Thatis,afloodpeakmaybeincreascdascanal flows drain into the <br />Pioneer Ditch floodplain, or a peak moy be reduced should floodwaters <br />from above a given ditch be intercepted and diverted out of waters hed. In <br />either case, for the critical l00~year event, peak flows from the drainage <br />area tributary to Pioneer Ditch arc of such magnitude as to wake the effect <br />of ditch failures relatively smal1- perhaps less than 20 percent and <br />should be ignored. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.