My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00925
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00925
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 10:51:24 AM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:35:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Title
Colorado Flood Hydrology Manual - Section 22 Program
Date
9/1/1993
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />assumption of uniform-flow conditions, the energy slope is considered equal to the <br />average channel bed slope; therefore, this approach should not be applied in <br />backwater areas. <br /> <br />Observed inflow and outflow hydrographs can be used to compute <br />channel storage by an inverse process of flood routing. When both inflow and outflow <br />are known, the change in storage can be computed, and from that a storage vs. <br />outflow function can be developed. Tributary inflow, if any, must also be accounted <br />for in this calculation. The total storage is computed from some base level storage at <br />the beginning or end of the routing sequence. <br /> <br />Inflow and outflow hydrographs can also be used to compute routing <br />criteria through a process of iteration in which an initial set of routing criteria is <br />assumed, the inflow hydrograph is routed, and the results are evaluated. The process <br />is repeated if necessary until a suitable fit of the routed and observed hydrograph is <br />obtained. <br /> <br />2.2 DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF ROUTING STEPS. In reservoir <br />routing, the Modified Puis method is applied with one routing step. This is under the <br />assumption that the travel time through the reservoir is smaller than the computation <br />interval At. In channel routing, the travel time through the river reach is often greater <br />than the computation interval. When this occurs the channel must be broken down <br />into smaller routing steps in order to simulate the flood-wave movement and changes <br />in hydrograph shape. The number of steps (or reach lengths) affects the attenuation <br />of the hydrograph and should be obtained by calibration. The maximum amount of <br />attenuation will occur when the channel routing computation is done in one step. As <br />the number of routing steps increases, the amount of attenuation decreases. An initial <br />estimate of the number of routing steps (NSTPS) can be obtained by dividing the total <br />travel time (K) for the reach by the computation interv;'ll At. <br /> <br />K=!. <br /> <br />(3) <br /> <br />Vw <br /> <br />NSTIPS = K <br />At <br /> <br />(4) <br /> <br />Where: <br /> <br />K <br /> <br />= total travel time through the reach <br />L = channel reach length <br />V w = velocity of the flood wave <br />NSTPS = number of routing steps <br /> <br />The time interval At is usually determined by ensuring that <br />there is a sufficient number of points on the rising side of the inflow hydrograph. A <br />general rule of thumb is that the computation interval should be less then 1/5 of the <br /> <br />7-41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.