My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00925
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00925
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 10:51:24 AM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:35:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Title
Colorado Flood Hydrology Manual - Section 22 Program
Date
9/1/1993
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CHANNEL ROUTING - HYDROLOGIC METHODS <br /> <br />1. BACKGROUND THEORY. <br /> <br />Routing is a process used to predict the temporal and spatial variations <br />of a flood hydrograph as it moves through a riverreach or reservoir. The effects of <br />storage and flow resistance, within a river reach, are reflected by changes in <br />hydrograph shape and timing as the flood wave moves from upstream to downstream. <br /> <br />In general, routing techniques may be classified into two categories: <br />hydraulic routing and hydrologic routing. Hydraulic routing techniques are based on <br />the solution of the partial differential equations of unsteady open channel flow. These <br />equations are often referred to as the St. Venant equations or the dynamic wave <br />equations. Hydrologic routing employs the continuity equation and either an analytical <br />or an empirical relationship between storage within the reach and discharge at the <br />outlet. <br /> <br />Flood forecasting, reservoir and channel design, flood plain studies and <br />watershed simulations generally utilize some form of routing. Typically, in watershed <br />simulation studies, hydrologic routing il? utilized on a reach-by-reach basis from <br />upstream to downstream. For example, it is often necessary to obtain a discharge <br />hydrograph at a point downstream from a location where a hydrograph has been <br />observed or computed. For such purposes, the upstream hydrograph is routed <br />through the reach with a hydrologic routing techniques that predicts changes in <br />hydrograph shape and timing. Local flows are then added at the downstream location <br />to obtain the total flow hydrograph. This type of approach is adequate as long as <br />there are no significant backwater effects, or discontinuities in the water surface due <br />to jumps or bores. When there are downstream controls that will have an effect on <br />the routing process through an upstream reach, the channel configuration should be <br />treated as one continuous system. This can only be accomplished with a hydraulic <br />routing technique that can incorporate backwater effects as well as internal boundary <br />conditions, such as those associated with culverts, bridges, and weirs. <br /> <br />Hydrologic routing employs the use of the continuity equation and either <br />an analytical or an empirical relationship between storage within the reach and <br />discharge at the outlet. In its simplest form, the continuity equation can be written <br />as inflow minus outflow equals the rate of change of storage within the reach: <br /> <br />I - 0 = dS <br /> <br />(1 ) <br /> <br />dt <br /> <br />Where: <br /> <br />= The average inflow to the reach during dt <br />o = The average outflow from the reach during dt <br /> <br />7-38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.