My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00925
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00925
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 10:51:24 AM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:35:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Title
Colorado Flood Hydrology Manual - Section 22 Program
Date
9/1/1993
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PRECIPITATION <br /> <br />1. BACKGROUND THEORY. <br /> <br />Synthetic or hypothetical storms are frequently used by the Corps of <br />Engineers to generate synthetic flood events for evaluation of existing flood conditions <br />and for study of the effects of flood-mitigation components. The degree of <br />dependency on synthetic flood events during a flood evaluation depends generally on <br />the number of gages and the length of hydrologic record available. For reservoir <br />studies there is typically at least one long-record stream gage near the dam site, and <br />thus the storage required for reservoir food control is usually computed by period-of- <br />record simulation techniques using recorded data. Channels, levees, and other local <br />protection projects are more likely to be sized by synthetic storm-flood analyses since <br />these projects often extend over many miles of the stream, and it is rare that gage <br />information would be available throughout the reach. <br /> <br />Hypothetical storms are also used to ensure that rare storm-flood events <br />are included in an overall assessment of the proposal. Since large storms that cause <br />major floods are infrequent, the available runoff record quite possibly may not reflect <br />the occurrence of these rare events. Analyses of major reservoirs, although relying <br />mainly on recorded stream data, also require the use of synthetic storms (Standard <br />Project and Probable Maximum Storms) to evaluate the safety of major dam <br />components, such as the spillway and outlet works, and guard against overtopping <br />of the dam. Synthetic precipitation data are also used for analyses of flooding <br />throughout a basin, testing of the hydrologic effects of alternative land uses and flood <br />plain regulations, and evaluation and design of flood control components. This is <br />usually done with a model of the watershed to simulate the rainfall-runoff process, <br />with the rainfall specified by hypothetical storms. <br /> <br />2. DATA SOURCES. <br /> <br />The primary sources of hypothetical storm il)formation for the United <br />States are various technical publications (TP) of the National Weather Service (NWS) <br />and hydrometeorological reports (HMR) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric <br />Administration (NOAA). All publications for development of hypothetical frequency <br />storms feature generalized isopluvial rainfall maps and/or regression equations. Other <br />methods, such as statistical analysis of nearby long-record rain gages to derive <br />hypothetical storms of particular frequencies in lieu of the NWS and NOAA <br />procedures, are used extensively in some parts of the United States but not discussed <br />here. <br /> <br />7-11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.