Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3005). A period of 1900-1969 was used to allemptto replicate the analysis done by NOAA Atlas 2. <br />This will provide a baseline for the comparison of WRC's longer precipitation record analyses. The <br />period from 1900-1996 and 1997 was used for the daily analyses to evaluate the impact of the longer <br />period of record. and specifically the July 1997 rainfall event, on the current NOAA Atlas 2 rainfall <br />values. Similarly the period from 1948-1996 and 1997 was used for the hourly analyses. Analyses <br />provided by Oli Sveinsson at Colorado State University use similar data for the "at-site" hourly <br />analyses. The regional hourly analyses provided by Oli Sveinsson incorporates the Boulder 2 and <br />Longmont 6NW gages with the Fort Collins gage. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1. 24 Hour Duration Analysis: <br />Since the purpose of the analysis was to detennine the relative impact of the additional record <br />on the statistical results, the analysis was perfonned with two distinct periods of record. It was <br />assumed that NOAA Atlas was based on the period of record through 1969. The first task to <br />undertake is to allemptto replicate the NOAA Atlas 2 results. This will present a bases on <br />which to compare the different analyses by WRC with NOAA Atlas 2. The available data for <br />the Fort Collins gage includes daily data for the entire period and 24 hour data for only the <br />period from 1948 to 1997. Therefore, this comparative analysis was perfonned with the daily <br />data since the 24 hour data was not available for an equivalent period of record as was used <br />in the development of NOAA Atlas 2. The final results were converted to 24 hour results <br />using typical I day to 24 hour correlation factors provide by NOAA as shown in Figure 2 and <br />from annual maximum to partial duration series shown in figure 3. The results of these <br />analyses are presented in table I and figures 4 and 5. The supporting I-Day analyses are <br />presented in Appendix C. The 24 Hour analyses are in Appendix E. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />To accomplish the comparison between NOAA Atlas 2 and WRC's analyses, WRC used both <br />Log Pearson III in accordance with the procedures outlined in Bulletin 17B (1981) and Fisher- <br />Tippet distributions for approximately the same period of record, as stated earlier. To perfonn <br />the LP III analyses, a program developed by the USGS was used (PEAKFQL, Version 2.3). <br />For the Fisher-Tippet analyses. a spreadsheet was developed. The difference with NOAA <br />Atlas 2 is that it is based on regional analyses done using a Fisher-Tippet Type Idistribution, <br />developed by Gumbel in 1958 (NOAA Atlas 2,1973). The comparison of these analyses are <br />presented in Table I and Figures 4 and 5. The supporting analyses are contained in Appendix <br />C. <br /> <br />-5- <br />