Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Fifth, the infonnation was filtered to include only those stations which had reported on the same stonn <br />event. This infonnation was again ranked and plotted so as to highlight the locations of stations with <br />above average rainfall versus stations with below average rainfalL The results, which are presented both <br />on Figure 13 and in Table I I, again showed only a very weak correlation between the location of the <br />station as referenced from the center ofthe City to the average rainfall event. The infonnation was then <br />filtered to eliminated extreme values as before with the same result. These results are presented in Figure <br />14 and in Table 12. <br /> <br />Finally, a data set was prepared which only included stonn events which were driven by moderate to <br />strong upslope weather conditions. The stonns in this data set are presented in Table-13. This data set <br />was filtered into four sub-data sets similar to the filtering ofthe full data set. The description and resulting <br />Tables and Figures are as follows: <br /> <br />FlL TER <br /> <br />RESULTS PRESENTED ON <br /> <br /> <br />Table-I4 and Figure-IS <br /> <br /> <br />Table-IS and Figure-I6 <br /> <br /> <br />Table- I 6 and Figure- I 7 <br /> <br /> <br />Table-17 and Figure- I 8 <br /> <br />A. Reporting of at least 70% of the stonn events <br /> <br /> <br />B. nAil above but with minimum and maximum values removed <br /> <br /> <br />C. Stations with stonn events in common <br />D. "C" above but with minimum and maximum values removed <br /> <br />The results of these analyses showed trends and scatter similar to the full data set analyses. <br /> <br />The 1997 stonn event was included in this analysis only as measured by weather watchers stations. Non- <br />weather watcher data (i.e. rainfall amounts measured or estimated by the general public) was not included <br />to maintain consistency in the data analysis. If included, then the same type of data would need to be <br />included for the other stonn events. <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS: <br />The conclusion that was drawn from the examination and analysis of the weather watcher data is that <br />there is a trend in a larger amount of precipitation occurring in the region west of the center of the City <br />of Fort Collins as compared to the amount that occurs to the east of the center of the City. The trend <br />mainly occurs along the Cache La Poudre River. However, there was not a significant difference in the <br />amount of rainfall due to the elevation ofthe weather watcher station. Given this infonnation, we would <br />not recommend the use of different design precipitation data for the eastern versus western areas of the <br /> <br />-12- <br />