Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />",." <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3) Synthetic Unit Hydrograph: This nll'thod is described in <br />"Hydrology for Engineers" by Linsley, Kohler and Paulhus, NcGraw-lIill <br />Co., 1958. The following information was used in the computations. <br /> <br />= <br /> <br />48.6 ft/mile <br /> <br />measured from tapa sheets <br />" " " " <br />" " " " <br />Computed <br />(From CSU data) <br />Computed <br /> <br />L = 36.6 miles <br /> <br />L = 23.7 miles <br />ca <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Sst <br />Lag = 4.5 hours <br /> <br />Cp = 0.60 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />tp <br /> <br />= 4 hours <br /> <br />Unit graph peak - 12,600 cfs <br /> <br />laO-year, I-hour <br />rainfall = 2.2 inches <br /> <br />USWIl Tech. P"per 40 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Basin Rainfall = 2.2(0.7)=1.54 in. Area reduction, US).))) TP40, <br />Fig. 15 <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />Using an average infiltration rate of l.O-inch per hour and a rair,fa'Ll <br />distr.ibution as suggested by Eagleson, "Dynamic Hydrology," McGraw- <br />Hill, 1970, a rainfall excess of 0.70 inches was computed. Based on <br />the above computations, the 100-year peak discharge was computed to <br />be B,700 cfs. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />One other comment that may be beneficial in the final decision was <br />offered by Clifford Jenkins of this office. Cliff made a field <br />inspection of Wellington following the 1961 flood. He stated that lloxeldEr <br />Creek was flowing about one-half full or about 7 feet deep. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Coal Creek: I:uring the field inspection Ted Hurr and I >Talked the <br />channel of Coal Creek in the vicinity of North Pouch:e Ditch about 3 <br />miles north of \Vellington (drainaGe area equals 70.2 sq. mi.). <br />Upstream from the Ditch, the channel is poorly defined but i,1cntifiable, <br />A berm along the south side of the Ditch averages 4 feet in h',ight and <br />would intercept almost all flood flow except for a small amount that <br />might flow through an opening just east of the railr"nd. South lOf <br />this berm the channel can be identified for about 1,000 feet until <br />it reaches the north-south road in section 15. From this point south <br />no evidence of the channel could be located. The land lws been leveled <br />for irrigated farming and several small field dit~hes cross the "rea. <br /> <br />. <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />. <br />