<br />.
<br />
<br />74-
<br />
<br />FLOODS IN COLORADO
<br />
<br />18597
<br />
<br />The next known flood in this area was that of the late 1850's, tenta-
<br />tively dated as 1859, which affected chiefly the Arkansas River below
<br />the mouth of the Purgatoire River. A. W. McHendrie, former dis-
<br />trict judge at Trinidad, obtained information from L. M. Kreeger,
<br />for many years a peace officer at Trinidad, who in his earlier years
<br />had been a guard and hunter with wagon trains following the Santa
<br />Fe Trail. In 1911 both Mr. McHendrie and Mr. Kreeger were at
<br />Lamar, and the latter told of camping in the late fifties just north of a
<br />hill beyond the south end of the present bridge at Lamar, It was
<br />raining when the wagon train camped at that point. The Arkansas
<br />River continued to rise and in 7 days it had reached the base of the
<br />hill and was 2 or 3 miles wide. Mr. Kreeger took Mr. McHendrie
<br />to the site of his old camp, which was easily identified. By sighting
<br />across the valley from the baEe of the hill, Mr. McHendrie estimated
<br />that the water must have been about 15 feet deep at the present site
<br />of Lamar. The peak of the flood did not last very long-a day or
<br />less-but the entire valley was under water for several days. Mr,
<br />Kreeger stated that the wagon train continued its journey up the
<br />Arkansas River to the Purgatoire River, along which they found.
<br />evidence of large cottonwood trees having been uprooted nnd washed
<br />away during the recent flood. The Arkansas River above the Pur-
<br />gatoire River was also in flood, but as no mention was made of trees
<br />along it having been uprooted it is believed that the flood there was
<br />not as severe as on the Purgatoire River. This belief is strengthened
<br />by the fact that the early settlers at Pueblo left no record of this flood,
<br />apparently considering it merely the usual spring rise. As the Santa
<br />Fe Trail left the Purgatoire River a few miles above its mouth, no
<br />information on flood conditions on the upper part of that river was
<br />obtained. However, the channel of the Purgatoire River at Trinidad
<br />at that time was so narrow that it was spanned by a footlog, so it is
<br />evident that this flood dia not originate in the mountains above
<br />Trinidad but on the plnins, probably in the canyon section.
<br />
<br />lS64
<br />
<br />The first flood on the Arkansas River for which detailed information
<br />has been found occurred June 11, 1864, as a result of the general
<br />storm over eastern Colorado, The early settlers agree that this flood
<br />reached a point near Third and Santa Fe Avenues in Pueblo, and if,
<br />as seems probable, tile street has been graded down since 1864, the
<br />flood of that year may have been nearly as high as the flood of 1921.
<br />During the flood of 1921 all the streams in the valley were very high
<br />and overflowed their banks for grcat distances."
<br />
<br />41 Follansbee. Robert, and Jones, E. E., Tbe Arkansas River flood o( June 3-6, 1921: U..,S. Oea!. Survey
<br />Water-Bupply Paper 4S7, p. 36, 19n.
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />MAJOR FLOODS-ARKANSAS RIVER
<br />
<br />75
<br />
<br />1861
<br />
<br />A flood in May 1867 caused the removal of Fort Lyon to a place
<br />17 miles farther west. The rainfall record at Fort Lyon was as follows:
<br />May 24-26, 1.80 inches; May 29, 1.00 inch; May 30, 1.15 inches; a
<br />total of 3.95 inches, as compared with a normal rainfall of 2 inches
<br />for the entire month, This flood was probably caused chiefly by
<br />melting snow, as the Canon City Record of June 2, 1894, quotes
<br />historian B. F. Rockafellow, as saying that tbe melting of the snow
<br />at the time of the flood of 1867 caused "the streams [in the vicinity
<br />of Canon City] to become swollen into rushing torrents." The Bent
<br />County Democrat, June 15, 1921, quotes John W. Powers, county
<br />clerk, as follows:
<br />
<br />I have heard ,my mother tell of the great flood of 1867. which must have surM
<br />passed the one of this month. At the time to which she referred both the Arkansas
<br />.and the Purgatoire were at flood stage simultaneously, with the result that the
<br />Arkansas River in the section where Lama.r now stands was a solid body of water
<br />from the sand hills on the south side to the first upland on the north side of the
<br />river.
<br />
<br />1869
<br />
<br />During a flood in June 1869 the river is said to have contained an
<br />immense amount of water.
<br />
<br />1875
<br />
<br />The next flood of record on the Arkansas River is that of September
<br />16, 1875, which was caused primarily by high water in the Purgatoire
<br />River and therefore affected the Arkansas River chiefly below the
<br />Purgatoire. The Las Animas Leader, September 18, 1875, reported:
<br />I
<br />At Fort Lyon [4 miles below the mouth of the Purgatoire] the water was 4 feet
<br />higher than ever known before. The bottom land between the bridge a.nd the
<br />post trader's [a distance of three-fourths of a mile] was a swift, raging flood.
<br />
<br />The upper river was also in flood as far north as Pueblo, but as the
<br />Pueblo press gave little space to it the flood nt that point was evidently
<br />not serious.
<br />
<br />1884
<br />
<br />Rain and l'Un,off from melting of the heavy snow cover in June 1884
<br />caused a flood on the Arkansas River between the Grand Canyon,
<br />just above the Royal Gorge, nnd Pueblo. The Canon City ltecord,
<br />June 28, 1884, stated that the water was 2 feet deep on the railroad
<br />tracks in the Grand Canyon. The Pueblo Chieftain, July 5, 1884,
<br />stated:
<br />
<br />The Arkansas River is booming. It rose Rcveral inches mOre yesterday, and
<br />during the morning a sudden rUll of driftwood appeared. A great quantity of it
<br />. went down within a few hours and then the rnn stopped altogether. Immense
<br />cottonwood logs * 1(1 * threat,ened destruction to everything in their way.
<br />* lie * The river is doing more damage' to the Rio Grande road than ever
<br />
|