Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />74- <br /> <br />FLOODS IN COLORADO <br /> <br />18597 <br /> <br />The next known flood in this area was that of the late 1850's, tenta- <br />tively dated as 1859, which affected chiefly the Arkansas River below <br />the mouth of the Purgatoire River. A. W. McHendrie, former dis- <br />trict judge at Trinidad, obtained information from L. M. Kreeger, <br />for many years a peace officer at Trinidad, who in his earlier years <br />had been a guard and hunter with wagon trains following the Santa <br />Fe Trail. In 1911 both Mr. McHendrie and Mr. Kreeger were at <br />Lamar, and the latter told of camping in the late fifties just north of a <br />hill beyond the south end of the present bridge at Lamar, It was <br />raining when the wagon train camped at that point. The Arkansas <br />River continued to rise and in 7 days it had reached the base of the <br />hill and was 2 or 3 miles wide. Mr. Kreeger took Mr. McHendrie <br />to the site of his old camp, which was easily identified. By sighting <br />across the valley from the baEe of the hill, Mr. McHendrie estimated <br />that the water must have been about 15 feet deep at the present site <br />of Lamar. The peak of the flood did not last very long-a day or <br />less-but the entire valley was under water for several days. Mr, <br />Kreeger stated that the wagon train continued its journey up the <br />Arkansas River to the Purgatoire River, along which they found. <br />evidence of large cottonwood trees having been uprooted nnd washed <br />away during the recent flood. The Arkansas River above the Pur- <br />gatoire River was also in flood, but as no mention was made of trees <br />along it having been uprooted it is believed that the flood there was <br />not as severe as on the Purgatoire River. This belief is strengthened <br />by the fact that the early settlers at Pueblo left no record of this flood, <br />apparently considering it merely the usual spring rise. As the Santa <br />Fe Trail left the Purgatoire River a few miles above its mouth, no <br />information on flood conditions on the upper part of that river was <br />obtained. However, the channel of the Purgatoire River at Trinidad <br />at that time was so narrow that it was spanned by a footlog, so it is <br />evident that this flood dia not originate in the mountains above <br />Trinidad but on the plnins, probably in the canyon section. <br /> <br />lS64 <br /> <br />The first flood on the Arkansas River for which detailed information <br />has been found occurred June 11, 1864, as a result of the general <br />storm over eastern Colorado, The early settlers agree that this flood <br />reached a point near Third and Santa Fe Avenues in Pueblo, and if, <br />as seems probable, tile street has been graded down since 1864, the <br />flood of that year may have been nearly as high as the flood of 1921. <br />During the flood of 1921 all the streams in the valley were very high <br />and overflowed their banks for grcat distances." <br /> <br />41 Follansbee. Robert, and Jones, E. E., Tbe Arkansas River flood o( June 3-6, 1921: U..,S. Oea!. Survey <br />Water-Bupply Paper 4S7, p. 36, 19n. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />MAJOR FLOODS-ARKANSAS RIVER <br /> <br />75 <br /> <br />1861 <br /> <br />A flood in May 1867 caused the removal of Fort Lyon to a place <br />17 miles farther west. The rainfall record at Fort Lyon was as follows: <br />May 24-26, 1.80 inches; May 29, 1.00 inch; May 30, 1.15 inches; a <br />total of 3.95 inches, as compared with a normal rainfall of 2 inches <br />for the entire month, This flood was probably caused chiefly by <br />melting snow, as the Canon City Record of June 2, 1894, quotes <br />historian B. F. Rockafellow, as saying that tbe melting of the snow <br />at the time of the flood of 1867 caused "the streams [in the vicinity <br />of Canon City] to become swollen into rushing torrents." The Bent <br />County Democrat, June 15, 1921, quotes John W. Powers, county <br />clerk, as follows: <br /> <br />I have heard ,my mother tell of the great flood of 1867. which must have surM <br />passed the one of this month. At the time to which she referred both the Arkansas <br />.and the Purgatoire were at flood stage simultaneously, with the result that the <br />Arkansas River in the section where Lama.r now stands was a solid body of water <br />from the sand hills on the south side to the first upland on the north side of the <br />river. <br /> <br />1869 <br /> <br />During a flood in June 1869 the river is said to have contained an <br />immense amount of water. <br /> <br />1875 <br /> <br />The next flood of record on the Arkansas River is that of September <br />16, 1875, which was caused primarily by high water in the Purgatoire <br />River and therefore affected the Arkansas River chiefly below the <br />Purgatoire. The Las Animas Leader, September 18, 1875, reported: <br />I <br />At Fort Lyon [4 miles below the mouth of the Purgatoire] the water was 4 feet <br />higher than ever known before. The bottom land between the bridge a.nd the <br />post trader's [a distance of three-fourths of a mile] was a swift, raging flood. <br /> <br />The upper river was also in flood as far north as Pueblo, but as the <br />Pueblo press gave little space to it the flood nt that point was evidently <br />not serious. <br /> <br />1884 <br /> <br />Rain and l'Un,off from melting of the heavy snow cover in June 1884 <br />caused a flood on the Arkansas River between the Grand Canyon, <br />just above the Royal Gorge, nnd Pueblo. The Canon City ltecord, <br />June 28, 1884, stated that the water was 2 feet deep on the railroad <br />tracks in the Grand Canyon. The Pueblo Chieftain, July 5, 1884, <br />stated: <br /> <br />The Arkansas River is booming. It rose Rcveral inches mOre yesterday, and <br />during the morning a sudden rUll of driftwood appeared. A great quantity of it <br />. went down within a few hours and then the rnn stopped altogether. Immense <br />cottonwood logs * 1(1 * threat,ened destruction to everything in their way. <br />* lie * The river is doing more damage' to the Rio Grande road than ever <br />