<br />52
<br />
<br />FLOODS IN COLORADO
<br />
<br />a.nd an enormous volume of water laden with driftwood, poured into the already
<br />swollen channel, and the sullen roar of the rushing stream as it burst out of the
<br />canyon was heard for a long distance. On reaching thp. plains. the water spread
<br />out and submerged the bottom la.nds from bluff to bluff to a depth of several feet.
<br />The storm occurred in the afternoon and the raging torrent, plunging like the waves
<br />of the sea under the impnlKe of a gale, swept down through the soldiers' camp
<br />(at Laporte] in the night almost withou t waming. * * * When morning
<br />broke a scene of desolation presented it.self to view. The campgrounds were
<br />completely submerged ,and only the roofs of the cabins that had withstood tho
<br />onrush of water were visible, while 8.R far as the eye could reach up and down the
<br />river nothing but a ra~ing sea of muddy water could be ,,('cu. Fortunately, no
<br />lives were lost, but there w~re several narrow escapes by the s:ettlers on the bottom
<br />lands.
<br />
<br />Watrous also quotes a letter from Lt. Col. W. O. Collins, written
<br />August 21, 1864, to Gen. R. B. Mitehell:
<br />
<br />The present site [of the military post} is wit.hin the town of Laport(>. * * *
<br />The ground is subject to overflow, the whole having been under water and much
<br />public property damaged about the 10th of June last.
<br />
<br />Concerning the storm of May 22 and 23, 1876, the Greeley Tribune
<br />of May 24, 1876, stated:
<br />
<br />The Cache la Pondre is higher than at, any t.ime since the set.tlcrncnt of the
<br />colony [1870). H is reported that two bridp;cs on the [Uip;l Thompson have been
<br />carried away by the flood. The river bottom between Greeley and the Jackson
<br />Street Bridge is all under water. At the Oak Street Bridge t,he water was up to
<br />the caps; at 6 p. m. Ia.<;t evening lMay 23] it had fallen 2 inches. From [FortI
<br />Collins we hear that the river had fallen considerably so that our bridges may now
<br />be considered out of danKer.
<br />
<br />The melting of the unusually heavy snow cover of the winter of
<br />1883--84 causcd a total discharge for tho year that was more than 200
<br />percent of the average annual discharge for the period 1884 to datc.
<br />The recording gage which had been establish cd in the spring of 1884
<br />at the mouth of the eanyon was washed out a few days before the
<br />bighest discharge, which occurred on June 28; therefore no complete
<br />gage-height record of this flood exists. At a jater date the discharge
<br />during the pcriod of missing gage heights was estimnted, the maximum
<br />24-hour dischargo on June 28 being estimated at 5,610 second-feet.
<br />By comparison \vith peak flows of floods in later years this was not a
<br />large flood, The only known reference to overflow during the 1884
<br />high water is the statemeut in the Fort Collins Expl'Css, .June 17, 1923,
<br />that in 1884 the Boyd farm northwest of Greeley was en tircly under
<br />water for the first time.
<br />The failure, June 9, 1891, of thc wasteway at the Chambers Lake
<br />Reservoir on tho headwaters of the Cache la Poudrc River caused a
<br />V severe flood on that rivcr. According to thc local newspaper, the
<br />break was apparently caused by increased melting of the mountain
<br />snow. due to the warm weather a few days before. This flood de-
<br />
<br />T"
<br />. "
<br />
<br />MAJOR FLOODS-SOUTH PLATTE RIVER
<br />
<br />53
<br />
<br />strayed the recorder at the gaging station near the mouth of the
<br />canyon, hence no official record is available. The water commissioner,
<br />who was the observer, stated that the peak discharge was about 21,000
<br />second-feet." This estimate was evidently baser! on a high-water
<br />mark alld the extension of the rating curve. Although the rccorder
<br />was destroycd, a record of the mean daily discharge during the flood
<br />period was maintainl'd, presumably by means of a stalI gage, and the
<br />mean daily discharge for the cntire month was computcd. Thnt for
<br />Junc 7-14 is as follows:
<br />
<br />...
<br />
<br />.....1'\.'
<br />
<br />Discharge of Cache la Poudre River, June 1-14. 1891
<br />
<br />Second-feel Suo/id-/ul
<br />June 7 ______pu______ 1,900 June 11__________________ 3,060
<br />8__,_____,______ 2,440 12_____,,__,____,___ 2,640
<br />9___________uu 5,060 13____u____________ 2,190
<br />lO__u________u 3,600 14___________'uu__ 1, S60
<br />
<br />The Fort Collins Courier, iu its issue of June 11, 1891, gives the
<br />followiug account of this flood:
<br />
<br />About 4 p. m. June 9, the water superintendent was notified that a terrific
<br />flood was rushing down the [Cache la] Poudre canyon carrying everything before it.
<br />On come the mad, rushing torrent toward the plains, with deafening roar,
<br />carrying everyt,hing in its way to destruction. llridges, fences, hcndgatcs,
<br />buildiuj!;s, cattle, and horses were swept into the whirling, roaring, rushing flood.
<br />The island below the LaPorte bridge, on which livcd J. J. Nugent and family,
<br />was completaly submerged, the water covering the floor of Mr. Nugent's house to
<br />a depth of 27l! feet.
<br />The flood reached the railroa.d bridge north of the city (Fort Collins) about ,I)
<br />p. m. II: * * The bottomlands between the millrace and river were nearly
<br />all under water. The _meadows and fields on the north and east side of the river
<br />were flooded.
<br />An eye witness of the flood as it broke through the Poudrc canyon says the wall
<br />of wa.ter was fully 10 feet high and that logs and trees were tossed about like twigs.
<br />
<br />The flood of May 20-21, 1904, was the greatcst on the Cache In
<br />Poudre River for which definite evidence is available. It wns caused
<br />by heavy rains of cloudburst intensity in thc foothills on the head-. X
<br />waters of the North Fork Cache la Poudre River and Boxclder Crcek
<br />at all altitude of about 7,000.feet. The only rainfallrecor<1s in this
<br />arca were those at Alford (altitude 6,350 feet), and at Boxelder (altitude
<br />7,160 fect). The AlIord record showed a prccipitntion of 2.66 inches
<br />for thc 2-day pcriod May 19-20. As tho upper fonthills are at a higher
<br />altitudc, the Alford record docs not represent thc greatcst precipitation
<br />in the I1rea. The record at Boxeldcr indicated a total of 8 inches for
<br />the 2,day period, but the Weather Bureau rejected tillS record as
<br />exccssive. In view of the flood which followed, however, it would
<br />appear that the record was not greatly in error, especially as the
<br />
<br />JI Colorn.do State Engineer, 6th Bienn. Rept., p. 22, 1803.
<br />
|