Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />26 <br /> <br />FLOODS IN COLORADO, <br /> <br />MAJOR l!'LOOD&,-,-SOUTH PLA'rTE RIVER <br /> <br />27 <br /> <br />1894 that it is at present. H. L. Potts, engineer of the Denver' <br />, Water Board, computed the flow over this dam under a head of 5. <br />feet as about 4,500 second-feet. Taking this 88 the peak flow, the. <br />mean for the 24-hour period is estim'ated at about 3,500secondcfeet. <br />At Denver, the Rocky Mountain News, June 1 and 2, 1894, statea <br />that the South Platte River rose 4 feet on May 31 and W88 fully 10 <br />feet above low water at the Sixteenth Street Bridge in Denver. In <br />1895 a gaging station was established at the' Fifteenth Street Bridge,. <br />where conditions were similar to those at the Sixteenth Street Bridge. <br />From the extension of a rating curve developed subsequently. it is, <br />estimated that the peak flow for a stage 10 feet above low water was <br />about 14,000 second-feet. As the river remained near that stage for' <br />nearly 24 hours, ~he mean for the day was probably about, 13,000, <br />second-feet. If the river rose 4 feet to a 10-foot stage on May 31, <br />it had reached a stage of 6 feet on May 30, which indicat~s a dis-, <br />charge of nearly 8,000 second feet on that date. As Cherry Creek <br />had its normal small flow, practically all this water came from the, <br />upper South Platte River. <br />A dispatch to the Rocky Mountain News, May 31, 1894, stated <br />that at Brighton, 20 milcs below Denver, the situation was becoming <br />alarming, and that hundreds of acres of crops in the bottoms were <br />utterly ruined. Old timers were reported 88 saying that no such <br />flood on the South Platte River had occurred since 1876. The fol- <br />lowing day, June 1, It was reported that the river had gradually risen <br />all day and W88 from 1 foot to 6 feet deep over the lower lands. CleaI <br />Creek enters the South Platte River between Denver and Brighton, <br />and as the creek W88 also in flood the flow of the South Platte River' <br />was doubtless greater at Brighton than at Denver. This increase in, <br />discharge of the South Platte must have become materially greater <br />as far north 88 the mouth of St. Vrain Creek, near Platteville, as, <br />Boulder and St. Vrain Creeks both had heavy floods, The effect of <br />this increased volume of the South Platte River was noted near' <br />Brush, Colo., and reported in the Rocky Mountain News, June 3, <br />1894: <br /> <br />June 8, 1894, stated that for 24 hours on June 2 the flood touched the <br />caps on the top of the bridge piling. According to a local resident <br />the. crest. of the flood of 1921 re~ched nearly to the top of the piling, <br />which still had the same elevatiOn as in 1894. Thus the maximum <br />stage and presumably the maximum discharge of both floods were <br />nearly the same. No information is available regarding the flood <br />below Brush, but it is probable that channel storage flattened it out <br />increasiugly 88 it proceeded downstream. <br /> <br />Brush, Colo., June 2. The [South] Platte River commenced raising at noon <br />today and at this [not stated] hour it has raised 8 feet and is still coming up. <br />* III *. The water was within 1 foot of the bridge at 6 o'clock * * *.. <br />The water from the river is running out over the bottoms and the river is fully <br />2 miles wide. <br /> <br />A rough comparison of the height of the flood of 1894 and that of <br />1921 has been made at Fort Morgnn. The Fort Morgan Timesr <br /> <br />1921 <br /> <br />The severest flood of record on South Platte River occurred during <br />June 1921 and was caused by heavy rains widespread throughout the <br />State, June 2-7. The rainfall extended east of the mountains for <br />considerable distance, and the plains tributaries 88 well as those in <br />the mountains contributed to the flow in the South Platte River. <br />No gaging stations were being maintained at the mouths of the tribu- <br />.' taries, and it is impossible to determine the discharge entering the <br />river from tributary streams. <br />At South Platte, in the canyon section, the flood reached a stage <br />of about 9 feet and washed out the narrow-gage track of the Colorado <br />& Southern Railroad in tho canyon. From the mouth of the canyon <br />to Denver, a distance of 43 milos, farms in the bottom lands wore <br />inundated by the overflow, which varied in width from M to 1M miles. <br />Several families were driven from their homes. Bridges were ren- <br />dered impassable, and several were destroyed. The South Platte <br />River rose about 7 feet in Denver; the local press ostinlated that, <br />about 500 houses were inundated and many families forced to seek <br />higher ground. Three large packing plants and practically all the <br />lower feeding pens at the Denver Union Stock Yards were flooded.'&, <br />Ten acreS of railroad yards were flooded to a depth of 1 foot." The <br />bottom lan~s in the valley below Denver were flooded, the general <br />overflow bemg 88 much as 4 miles wide near Sterling, Between, <br />Brighton and Orchard, a distance of 30 miles, the wooden bridges <br />were impassable; 2 were destroyed, and the approaches to the others <br />were destroyed for a distance of several hundred yards. At Fort, <br />M organ the water surface was within a foot of the bridge level near <br />the Union Pacific Railroad station. <br />The following table shows the daily discharge of the South Platte <br />River at the various gaging stations. <br /> <br />Ia Rocky Mountain News, Denver, Colo., June 7, 1921. <br />17 Idem, June 9, 1921. <br />