<br />.
<br />
<br />26
<br />
<br />FLOODS IN COLORADO,
<br />
<br />MAJOR l!'LOOD&,-,-SOUTH PLA'rTE RIVER
<br />
<br />27
<br />
<br />1894 that it is at present. H. L. Potts, engineer of the Denver'
<br />, Water Board, computed the flow over this dam under a head of 5.
<br />feet as about 4,500 second-feet. Taking this 88 the peak flow, the.
<br />mean for the 24-hour period is estim'ated at about 3,500secondcfeet.
<br />At Denver, the Rocky Mountain News, June 1 and 2, 1894, statea
<br />that the South Platte River rose 4 feet on May 31 and W88 fully 10
<br />feet above low water at the Sixteenth Street Bridge in Denver. In
<br />1895 a gaging station was established at the' Fifteenth Street Bridge,.
<br />where conditions were similar to those at the Sixteenth Street Bridge.
<br />From the extension of a rating curve developed subsequently. it is,
<br />estimated that the peak flow for a stage 10 feet above low water was
<br />about 14,000 second-feet. As the river remained near that stage for'
<br />nearly 24 hours, ~he mean for the day was probably about, 13,000,
<br />second-feet. If the river rose 4 feet to a 10-foot stage on May 31,
<br />it had reached a stage of 6 feet on May 30, which indicat~s a dis-,
<br />charge of nearly 8,000 second feet on that date. As Cherry Creek
<br />had its normal small flow, practically all this water came from the,
<br />upper South Platte River.
<br />A dispatch to the Rocky Mountain News, May 31, 1894, stated
<br />that at Brighton, 20 milcs below Denver, the situation was becoming
<br />alarming, and that hundreds of acres of crops in the bottoms were
<br />utterly ruined. Old timers were reported 88 saying that no such
<br />flood on the South Platte River had occurred since 1876. The fol-
<br />lowing day, June 1, It was reported that the river had gradually risen
<br />all day and W88 from 1 foot to 6 feet deep over the lower lands. CleaI
<br />Creek enters the South Platte River between Denver and Brighton,
<br />and as the creek W88 also in flood the flow of the South Platte River'
<br />was doubtless greater at Brighton than at Denver. This increase in,
<br />discharge of the South Platte must have become materially greater
<br />as far north 88 the mouth of St. Vrain Creek, near Platteville, as,
<br />Boulder and St. Vrain Creeks both had heavy floods, The effect of
<br />this increased volume of the South Platte River was noted near'
<br />Brush, Colo., and reported in the Rocky Mountain News, June 3,
<br />1894:
<br />
<br />June 8, 1894, stated that for 24 hours on June 2 the flood touched the
<br />caps on the top of the bridge piling. According to a local resident
<br />the. crest. of the flood of 1921 re~ched nearly to the top of the piling,
<br />which still had the same elevatiOn as in 1894. Thus the maximum
<br />stage and presumably the maximum discharge of both floods were
<br />nearly the same. No information is available regarding the flood
<br />below Brush, but it is probable that channel storage flattened it out
<br />increasiugly 88 it proceeded downstream.
<br />
<br />Brush, Colo., June 2. The [South] Platte River commenced raising at noon
<br />today and at this [not stated] hour it has raised 8 feet and is still coming up.
<br />* III *. The water was within 1 foot of the bridge at 6 o'clock * * *..
<br />The water from the river is running out over the bottoms and the river is fully
<br />2 miles wide.
<br />
<br />A rough comparison of the height of the flood of 1894 and that of
<br />1921 has been made at Fort Morgnn. The Fort Morgan Timesr
<br />
<br />1921
<br />
<br />The severest flood of record on South Platte River occurred during
<br />June 1921 and was caused by heavy rains widespread throughout the
<br />State, June 2-7. The rainfall extended east of the mountains for
<br />considerable distance, and the plains tributaries 88 well as those in
<br />the mountains contributed to the flow in the South Platte River.
<br />No gaging stations were being maintained at the mouths of the tribu-
<br />.' taries, and it is impossible to determine the discharge entering the
<br />river from tributary streams.
<br />At South Platte, in the canyon section, the flood reached a stage
<br />of about 9 feet and washed out the narrow-gage track of the Colorado
<br />& Southern Railroad in tho canyon. From the mouth of the canyon
<br />to Denver, a distance of 43 milos, farms in the bottom lands wore
<br />inundated by the overflow, which varied in width from M to 1M miles.
<br />Several families were driven from their homes. Bridges were ren-
<br />dered impassable, and several were destroyed. The South Platte
<br />River rose about 7 feet in Denver; the local press ostinlated that,
<br />about 500 houses were inundated and many families forced to seek
<br />higher ground. Three large packing plants and practically all the
<br />lower feeding pens at the Denver Union Stock Yards were flooded.'&,
<br />Ten acreS of railroad yards were flooded to a depth of 1 foot." The
<br />bottom lan~s in the valley below Denver were flooded, the general
<br />overflow bemg 88 much as 4 miles wide near Sterling, Between,
<br />Brighton and Orchard, a distance of 30 miles, the wooden bridges
<br />were impassable; 2 were destroyed, and the approaches to the others
<br />were destroyed for a distance of several hundred yards. At Fort,
<br />M organ the water surface was within a foot of the bridge level near
<br />the Union Pacific Railroad station.
<br />The following table shows the daily discharge of the South Platte
<br />River at the various gaging stations.
<br />
<br />Ia Rocky Mountain News, Denver, Colo., June 7, 1921.
<br />17 Idem, June 9, 1921.
<br />
|