Laserfiche WebLink
<br />gaging station, the effect is a change in the stage- <br />discharge relation. Another effect is a change in <br />the conveyance capacity of the stream in the <br />affected reaches. Changes in conveyance can <br />result in changes in water-surface elevations for <br />floods of a given recurrence interval. Similarly, the <br />performance of engineered structures, such as <br />levees and bridges, is changed. <br /> <br />METHODS OF DETERMINATION OF <br />CHANNEL CHANGES <br /> <br />The quantity of channel change was deter- <br />mined using three methods. The first method used <br />remeasured cross sections. Changes in cross- <br />section geometry were examined over a period of <br />years and during individual floods. The second <br />method examined historic trends in the point-of- <br />zero-flow (PZF) elevation. The PZF is the eleva- <br />tion at which flow ceases to occur at a gaging <br />station. Finally, the third method used was repeat <br />photography. Repeat photographs were used to <br />document qualitative changes in channel shape, <br />vegetation, and sediment characteristics and to <br />provide photographic evidence of channel changes. <br /> <br />Site Selection <br /> <br />For this study, 10 streamflow-gaging stations <br />in and near Maricopa County, were selected. <br />Criteria for site selection included known changes <br />to channel geometry or characteristics, streamflow <br />records that exceeded 10 years, several measure- <br />ments of large discharge during the same flood, <br />mobile channels, and previously monitored cross <br />sections. <br /> <br />Site Survey <br /> <br />After site selection, existing cross-section dsta <br />were examined including those from current-meter <br />and indirect measurements of discharge. Current- <br />meter measurements included wading, bridge, and <br />cableway measurements. Cross-section geometry <br />was determined from these measurements by sub- <br />tracting the flow depth at locations along the cross <br />section from the gage height at the time of the dis- <br />charge measurement. At sites that had not been <br />surveyed previously for indirect measurements of <br /> <br />discharge, cross sections were surveyed for this <br />study. On the Hassayampa River near Arlington, <br />monumented cross sections surveyed by Parker <br />(1995) were resurveyed. <br /> <br />The depth measurements from current-meter <br />measurements were used to determine channel <br />changes during individual floods. The widespread <br />floods of January-March 1993 rank among the <br />largest in the history of discharge measurements in <br />Maricopa County. Channel change during this per- <br />iod was determined almost exclusively using data <br />from current-meter measurements of discharge. A <br />second period of smaller regional flooding occur- <br />red in 1995, and data from selected floods during <br />this period also were used to determine channel <br />change. <br /> <br />Long-term changes in channel geometry were <br />determined using survey data from indirect meas- <br />urements of discharge. Because the original pur- <br />pose of these surveys was to determine discharge, <br />rather than monitor channel change, cross-section <br />locations often changed from one survey to an- <br />other. The differences in location resulted in dif- <br />ferences in elevation that needed to be taken into <br />account before cross sections were compared for <br />the purpose of measuring channel change. In these <br />instances, the elevation data from one of the cross <br />sections were adjusted by multiplying the distance <br />of the cross section from a point common to both <br />sections by the slope (in percent) of the stream in <br />that reach. Because a key assumption of a slope- <br />area computation is that the stream channel gener- <br />ally is uniform, these modifications to the original <br />measurement data were considered reasonable for <br />this study of channel changes. <br /> <br />Channel Geometry <br /> <br />The historic cross-section data and data from <br />cross-section surveys done for this study were <br />compiled into a single data set (table I and <br />tables 2-12 in the section entitled "Cross-Section <br />Data" at the back of the report). From this data set, <br />cross-section plots were created to display cross- <br />section changes. Graphical representations of cross <br />sections in this report are oriented so that the view <br />is downstream and the left bank appears on the left <br />side of the graph. <br /> <br />4 Determination of Channel Change for Selected Streams, Maricopa County, Arizona <br />