Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mannings "n" values used in the calculations ..ere .04 for the channel and .065 <br />for the overbank areas. <br /> <br />The technical data developed for use in the HEC-2 model and the HEC-2 computer <br />results are included in the back of this r'=port. A table of the computed <br />water surface elevations for the 100-y=ar existing conditions flood is in- <br />cluded in the floodway section of this report. <br /> <br />FLOODPLAIN DELINEATIONS <br /> <br />Based on the results of the HEC-2 comput er model, the boundary of the 1 DO-year <br />flood was determined at the cross sect 1. on locat ions. Between Se ctions, the <br />boundary was interpolated using the following topographic: information. <br /> <br />Sections 87790 to 90330 <br />U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Flood Plain Information ~erry Creek, <br />flown April 1975. <br /> <br />Sections 0.00 to 4,440 <br />Northway - Gestalt, Topographic MaPE.!~Ciehmann, Martin Site 1 <br />foot CI, 1981 <br /> <br />lOO', 2 <br /> <br />Sections 4840 to ll020 <br />Analytical Surveys, Inc. Topographic Ma2ping, River Run Project, Digi- <br />tized Sections Only, 1984 <br /> <br />Sections ll600 to l7300 <br />Northway - Gestalt, Topographic Mapping.Ashbrook Site, l"=lOO', 2 foot <br />CI, 19 8l, and <br /> <br />U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and, ~:ry Creek Floodplain Information <br />Report Mapping, 1"=200' CI, flo,;n April, 1975. <br /> <br />FLOODWAY <br /> <br />Encroachment on floodplains such as art:Lficial fill, reduces the flood-carry- <br />ing capacity and increases flood heights, thus increas ing flood hazards in <br />areas beyond the encroachment itself. UsIng the floodway concept, the area of <br />the lOO-year floodplain is divided into two areas, f'loodway and floodway <br />fringe. The floodway is the channel of a stream, plus any adjacent floodplain <br />areas, that must be kept free of encroachment in order that the lOO-year flood <br />be carried without substantial increaseas in flood heights. For purposes of <br />this study, the allowable surcharge increase is 0.5' according to the guide- <br />Unes of Arapahoe County and the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. <br />The less restrictive 1.0 foot floodway, which is enforced by FEMA, has not <br />been included as part of this study, bu: can be found in the previous letter <br />of map revision for River Run (Reference 1). <br /> <br />A schematic drawing which shows typical relationships between the floodway and <br />floodway fringe and their significance to flood plain development follows: <br /> <br />- L .- <br />