Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Greiner <br /> <br />Grein ~ngineering Sciences. Inc. <br />570 W. 44th Avenue <br />Denver, Colorado 80216 <br />13031 455.7321 <br /> <br />November 4, 1985 <br /> <br />A Greiner Engineering, Inc. Company <br /> <br />Mr. William Judkins <br />Federal Emergency Management <br />500 C Street, S.W. <br />Washington, D.C. 20472 <br /> <br />Agency <br /> <br />RE: Cherry Creek, Arapahoe County, Colorado <br />Letter of Belief <br /> <br />Dear Bill: <br /> <br />As we discussed last week, I am reque"ting that FEMA review the enclosed re- <br />port and plan for the improvement along Cherry Creek and, if appropriate, <br />issue a letter of belief for the planned improvements. <br /> <br />As we discussed, the improvements along Cherry Creek will be presented to FEl1A <br />in three stages. These stages are as follows: <br /> <br />1. Obtain Letter of Map Revision for the existing bas"line conditions. This <br />work involves updating the current FEMA floodplain defInition to a more <br />technically supportive analysis u:;ing U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' hy- <br />drology and a very detailed hydraulic model which utilizes detailed field <br />survey. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />Obtain <br />Creek. <br />Cherry <br /> <br />Letter of Belief (1.0.13.) for proposed improvements to Cherry <br />These improvements will he made in conformance to the approved <br />Creek Master Plan. <br /> <br />3. Obtain Letter of Map Revision for the constructed Improvements. <br /> <br />',e have submitted the information required for Stage 1 previously and, accord- <br />ing to Mr. Steve Wilde of Dames and Moore, the review is almost complete. <br /> <br />It was originally contemplated that each of the developers in the area of the <br />Master Plan would submit a request for the t.O.B. and L.O.M.R. (Stages 2 and <br />3) separately and independently. However, I believe that it would be better, <br />both from a technical and review viewpoint, to obtain ~, single Letter of Be- <br />lief. This would allow FEMA to review the project in Its entirety and not in <br />individual phases. The developers haVE already agreed to construct their im- <br />provements in accordance to the Master Plall, so a combined 1.0.B. would be <br />appropriate. <br /> <br />Therefore, I would request that the enclosed study and preliminary plan be re- <br />viewed per our request for a Letter of Belief. This Letter of Belief would <br />apply to all channel improvements between Arapahoe Road and the Arapahoe-Doug- <br />las county line. <br />