My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00850
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00850
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:21:24 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:32:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
31
County
Arapahoe
Community
Unincorporated Arapahoe County
Title
Major Drainageway Planning - Little Dry Creek, Report, Volume I
Date
2/1/1974
Designation Date
6/1/1974
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />SYNOPSIS <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Existing urban improvements along the Little Dry Creek drainageways are <br /> <br /> <br />subject to frequent flood damage. Continuing urbanization of the area <br /> <br /> <br />will result in more flood plain encroachment and greater future flood <br /> <br /> <br />damage unless positive action is taken to halt such encroachments. <br /> <br /> <br />Flood plain zoning is clearly the most economical and satisfactory way <br /> <br /> <br />to stop further flood plain encroachment, and such zoning should be <br /> <br /> <br />effected as soon as possible. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Improvements that presently encroach on the flood plains require protec- <br /> <br /> <br />tion from flood flows. Most of these vulnerable improvements can be <br /> <br /> <br />given a high degree of protection by improving the major Little Dry Creek <br /> <br /> <br />drainageways. Proposed improvements include channelization, closed con- <br /> <br /> <br />duits, and the improvement and construction of flood detention dams. <br /> <br /> <br />Grass-lined and concrete-lined channels can be used to reduce flood plain <br /> <br /> <br />widths. Conduits can be used to convey flood flows underground. The ex- <br /> <br /> <br />isting Englewood Dam effectively reduces downstream flood discharge peaks, <br /> <br /> <br />but it requires extensive improvement to meet present safety standards. <br /> <br /> <br />Similarly, improvements are proposed to existing Blackmer and Quincy dams. <br /> <br />The new Holly, Berry and Prentice dams are proposed to provide additional <br /> <br /> <br />flood-peak-reducing detention capacity. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />A number of drainageway improvement plans were studied, ranging from the <br /> <br /> <br />minimum development of improving only Englewood Dam to far more extensive <br /> <br /> <br />development including channelization, conduits and a number of dams. The <br /> <br /> <br />proposed drainageway improvement plan selected by the Urban Drainage and <br /> <br /> <br />Flood Control District and the five participating local governments includes <br /> <br /> <br />improving Englewood Dam; raising and improving Blackmer and Quincy dam; <br /> <br />building Holly, Berry and Prentice dams; extending Cinderella conduit; and <br /> <br /> <br />channelizing parts of Little Dry Creek and Greenwood Gulch. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The estimated cost of the proposed improvements is $7,164,000 in 1973 dol- <br /> <br /> <br />lars. The estimated ratio of benefits derived from the project to costs <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />-1- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.