My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00850
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00850
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:21:24 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:32:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
31
County
Arapahoe
Community
Unincorporated Arapahoe County
Title
Major Drainageway Planning - Little Dry Creek, Report, Volume I
Date
2/1/1974
Designation Date
6/1/1974
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />H Y D R 0 LOG Y <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Flood hydro graphs were prepared at 37 hydrologic points in the <br /> <br /> <br />Little Dry Creek Basin as shown on Chart 2. Hydrographs were <br /> <br />computed at each point for 10, 25 and 100-year frequency floods, for <br /> <br /> <br />both existing and future conditions of basin development under two <br /> <br /> <br />conditions; (1) with Englewood Dam alone, and (2) with Englewood Dam <br /> <br /> <br />plus five proposed flood detention dams. In addition, spillway design <br /> <br /> <br />flood hydro graphs were developed for the preliminary design of Englewood <br /> <br /> <br />Dam and the five proposed flood detention dams. Spillway design flood <br /> <br /> <br />hydrographs were derived from estimates of the probable maximum precipi- <br /> <br /> <br />tation, or PMP, that can occur in the area. Such precipitation amounts <br /> <br /> <br />are many times greater than the 100-year frequency precipitation amount, <br /> <br /> <br />but their use is considered necessary for dam spillway design where possi- <br /> <br /> <br />ble dam failure could result in loss of life or very heavy property damage. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Floods <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />There are neither stream flow records nor precipitation records available <br /> <br /> <br />in the Little Dry Creek basin that can be used directly to estimate the <br /> <br /> <br />frequency of either major floods or major rainfall events. Therefore, <br /> <br /> <br />it was necessary to prepare estimated rainfall events and flood hydrographs <br /> <br /> <br />indirectly using records and data available in the surrounding area. <br /> <br /> <br />Major floods in the area occur as a result of heavy rainfall events. Be- <br /> <br /> <br />cause of the relatively low elevation of the basin, major floods do not <br /> <br /> <br />result from snow melt nor is snow melt runoff considered to increase <br /> <br /> <br />rainfall floods significantly. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Procedure <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The Little Dry Creek basin hydro graphs were prepared using primarily <br /> <br /> <br />the data and methods presented in the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria <br /> <br /> <br />Manual, Volume I, Denver Regional Council of Governments, 1969, which is <br /> <br /> <br />referred to herein as the Drainage Criteria Manual. The general sequence <br /> <br /> <br />followed in preparing the 10, 25, and 100-year flood hydrographs in the <br /> <br /> <br />basin was: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />-26- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.