Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Land Erosion and Sedimentation <br /> <br />Two levels of land surface erosion analysis have been developed for application in the <br />pilot study. The basic level is to compute land surface erosion potential for each grid cell <br />within the study area. The data variables uf land use. slope and soil erosion index will be <br />automatically retrieved from the data bank and formatted for use in erosion potential <br />calculations. The computatiuns will be performed by the STORM program for alterna- <br />tive land use patterns and the results displayed in computer graphic format. The Soil <br />Conservation Service. Universal Soil Loss Equation technique is used to compute land sur- <br />face erosion potential. <br />The second level of erosion analysis will track the movement of sediment eroded from <br />each cell and determine its ultimate deposition location. The erosion computations are <br />performed as above and the material is then transported using a simplified transport <br />model that moves material from cell to cell. The result will be presented as a graphic dis- <br />play of the annual rate of erosion or deposition on a cell-by-cell basis. <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The Corps of Engineers has performed pilot studies that develop flood hazard, flood <br />damage and environmental information for existing and alternative future development <br />patterns as a continuing planning service to local government agencies with land use <br />management responsibilities. Spatial data management techniques have proven to provide <br />the technical capability to perform the comprehensive assessments quickly and systemati- <br />cally. The overall process of data collection and encoding to create a data bank, and <br />processing to interface with modeling computer programs has been found to be rational <br />and achievable although tedioos and requiring particular attention to detail. The tech- <br />niques used are generally modest extensions (although somewhat automated) of tradi- <br />tional analysis methods familiar to most analysts serving the Corps planning function. <br /> <br />ACKNOWLEDGMENTS <br /> <br />The investigation reported herein was perform~d for the U.S. Army Engineer District, Savannah, <br />by the Hydrologic Engineering Center. The study was performed under the direction of the writer <br />with special contributions by R. Pat Webb, Computer Systems Analyst, and Michael W. Burnham, Civil <br />Engineer of the Planning Analysis Branch. Dale Burnett, Chief, Special Assistance Branch, assisted by <br />Marilyn Hurst. Engineering Technician, provided valuable hydrologic analysis assistance. Water quality <br />and erosion analysis is performed under the direction of Tony Thomas, Chief, Research Branch, by <br />Jess Abbott fOJ storm water quality analysis, R. G. Willey for in.stream quality and Michael Gee. for <br />surface erosion transport. Support by the HEC Director, Bill S. Eichert, and other HEC staff contri. <br />buted to the success of the project. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />LITERATURE CITED <br /> <br />; <br /> <br />Environmental Systems Research Institute, AUTOMAP II Users Manual, 60 pp. <br />Franzini, et al., 1971. Urbanizations Drainage Consequences. Journal of the Urban Planning and <br />Development Division, Proceedings of ASeE, December, pp. 217.237. <br />Institute for Water Resources. Honey Hill, A Systems Analysis for Planning the Multiple Use or Con- <br />trolled Water Areas.lWR Report 71.9, p. 403. <br />The Hydrologic Engineering Center, 1976. Annual Report. Davis, California, 50 pp. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />"- <br />