My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00825
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00825
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 10:51:19 AM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:30:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Title
Local Flood Proofing Programs
Date
6/1/1994
Prepared For
US Army Corps of Engineers
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2. Flood Proofing <br /> <br />Two approaches may be used to protect a property from flood damage: structural and <br />nonstructural. Structural methods are intended to prevent flooding by altering the flow of <br />floodwater; these include constructing levees or dams, or modifying a waterway's channel. <br />Nonstructural methods are intended to reduce damage from encroaching floodwater by <br />altering the property; these include acquiring and/or relocating a building, preparing <br />emergency measures, such as sandbagging, and flood proofing structures. <br /> <br />Rood proofing is defined as "any combination of changes or adjustments incorporated in the <br />design, construction, or alteration of individual buildings or properties that will reduce flood <br />damages." Unlike a structural approach, the building site remains subject to flooding; it is the <br />building or the area adjacent to it that is modified to prevent or minimize flood damage. <br /> <br />Some approaches to flood proofing rely on human intervention. "Human intervention" is the <br />need for one or more people to be present to take the right steps to make a flood proofing <br />system work. For example, if a floodwall will provide protection only if someone installs a <br />closure or activates a pump, it is considered to need human intervention. Measures that need <br />human intervention are considered less dependable, especially if little warning of flood <br />conditions can be expected. since failure to perform human intervention tasks can result in <br />flood damage. <br /> <br />The community programs described in this report funded five approaches to flood proofing. <br />They are summarized in the following sections: <br /> <br />2.1 Elevating the building, so that floodwaters do not reach any damageable portions of it. <br /> <br />2.2 Constructing barriers between the building and floodwaters ("barriers"). <br /> <br />2.3 Making the building walls and floor watertight so water does not enter ("dry flood <br />proofing"). <br /> <br />2.4 Modifying the structure and relocating the contents so that when floodwaters enter the <br />building there is little or no damage ("wet flood proofing"). <br /> <br />2.5 Preventing sewer backups and basement flooding. <br /> <br />2.1 Elevation <br /> <br />The best way to protect a house from surface flooding. short of removing it from the flood <br />plain, is to raise it above the design flood level. This allows floodwaters to flow under a <br />building, causing little or no damage. Most communities have building codes for new and <br />substantially improved buildings located in flood plains that require that this method be used. <br />It is commonly practiced in flood prone locations throughout the country. <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.