Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />V. VALIDITY OF PREVIOUS STUDIES <br /> <br />General <br /> <br />Some common procedures and methodologies were used in the previous studies which <br />were app1 ied to the Frisco and Summit County Hydrology Report. When a study <br />reach contains stream gage data, then the statistical analysis of the individual <br />gage is used to determi ne the appropri ate peak fl ow rates for the recurrence <br />intervals as part of this FrS. Adjustments for locations downstream or upstream <br />from the gage station are done by making a discharge - drainage area comparison. <br /> <br />Regional Regression Analysis of all the stream gage data within a region of <br />s i mi 1 ar characteri st i cs provi des a general re 1 at i onshi p that app 1 i es to most <br />tributaries. For the previous studies, the regression equations were simplified <br />to use drainage area as the only variable. The simplification was justified <br />because the other variables did not provide significant improvement in <br />correlation. These regression equations allowed peak flow rates to be calculated <br />for most tributaries in the study region (the Blue River Basin). Snowmelt is <br />recognized as the peak flow contributor for large basins and rainfall is <br />responsible for peak flows of small basins (less than 30 square miles) at a <br />longer recurrence interval, such as a 100-year storm. <br /> <br />The procedures and methodo 1 ogi es descri bed above were revi ewed and are cons i dered <br />proper for the available data, such as stream gage flow rates and precipitation <br />records. <br /> <br />7 <br />