My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00810
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00810
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 10:51:18 AM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:29:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Title
Bear Creek Flood - Colorado and Kansas
Date
5/14/1951
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />one that offers the greatest economic justification embraces the cbnstruc- <br />tion of' a reservoir near Mustang, CoJ.orado, 44.5 miles above the ~6uth of <br />the river. The improvement would reduce a flood of 40,000 cubic tfet per <br />second d:i.scharge to bank capacity of 10,000 cubic reet per second nd <br />thereby eliminate all damages !'rom floods up to and including 40,0 0 cu- <br />bic feet per second in the lower valley except those due' to caving banks" <br />After considering prior irrigation rights below the dam site, apprpxi- <br />mately 5,200 acre-feet of supplemental irrigation water would be ajvail- <br />able. He estimates the first cost of the improvement at $2,609,30P and <br />the annual carrying charge at $127,600,; The annual benefits are esti- <br />mated at $56,970. The ratio of benefits to, costs is .45 to 1. He*onu <br />eludes that the improvement is not economically justified and ree ends <br />that no stream improvement project on Huerfano River, COlorado, be-au- <br />thoriz~d by Congress at the present time ~ The di viaion eng.ineer crncurs 0 <br /> <br />5. The Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors concurs inl the <br />views and recommendations of the reportin~ officers. The Board reFommends <br />that no improvement ot Huerfano River, COlorado, for ncod controll be made <br />at this time. 'I <br /> <br />I <br />6. After due consideration p+ these reports" I concur in th~ views <br />and recommendations of the Board. I therefore report that improvement of <br />Huerfano River, Colorado, for flood control is not advisable at tiS time. <br /> <br /> <br />E. Reybo1d, <br />Major General, II <br />Chief of Engineers. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br /> <br />CE <br />To: <br /> <br />SPEWF <br /> <br />The Secretary of War 0 <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />---l <br /> <br />- 2.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.