Laserfiche WebLink
<br />BRIDGElCUL VERT FORM <br /> <br />Analysis (Cont'd) <br /> <br />Loss Coefficients <br /> <br />Entrance loss coefficient <br />Manning's "n" value assigned to the structure(s) <br />Friction loss coefficient through structure(sl <br />Other loss coefficients (e.g., bend, <br />manhole, 'ltc.) <br />Total loss cOl'.fficient <br />Weir coefficient <br />Pier coefficient <br />Contraction JOBS coefficient <br />Expansion lOBS coefficient <br /> <br />0.03 <br /> <br />1.5 <br /> <br />2.6 <br />1.05 <br />..Q.,.... <br />.....~ <br /> <br />o.~ <br />o.,r;:. <br /> <br />Sediment Transport Consid~tions <br /> <br />1. A. Is there any indication from historical reconis that sediment tra.nsport (including scour <br />and deposition) ean affect the loo.year waw.r-sw-raee elevations,? <br />DYes [2] No <br /> <br />B. Based on the conditions (such as geomorphology.. vegetative cov.er and development of <br />the watershed and Btream bed, and bank conditions), is there a potential for debris and <br />sediment transport (including scour and depoBition) to affect th.. 100-year water-surface <br />elevlltions and/or conveyance capacity through the bridge/culvert? <br />DYes IKI No <br /> <br />2. If the answer to either 1A or IB is yes: <br />A. What is the estimated sediment (bed mat.erial) load? <br /> <br />crs (attach gradation curve) <br /> <br />El<Jllain method used to estimate the sediment tl'llnsport and l:h'l depth of scour and/or <br />deposition <br /> <br />B. Will sediment accumulate anywhere through the bridge/culvert? <br />DYes <br /> <br />IX] No <br /> <br />If yes, explain wbat is the impact on the r.onveyance capacity through the <br />bridge/cuI vert? <br /> <br />October 1992 <br /> <br />Page 50f6 <br /> <br />APPUCATJOHICEK11nCATJON FORMS J'OR CONDmOH.-\L lrrrEJl OF ItAP lllVISJOff. U'rrER Of MAP RI:vIS1Of1 ANllPHYSlC::ALWAP R&VlS1otf <br />