FLOOD00802

• Designation Number: 355
• County: Weld
• Community: Greeley
• Stream Name: Cache La Poudre
• Title: Floodplain and Floodway Analysis
• Date: 1/1/1994
• Designation Date: 3/1/1994
• Floodplain - Doc Type: Floodplain Report/Masterplan

"-

-

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
RIVERINE/COASTAL MAPPING FORM

() M B. 8urden No. 3067-0148 FfMA USE ONL y
Expires July 31 1994

.
PUBLIC BURDEN UISCLOSURE NUTICr:

Public reporting. burden for lhi~ form is estimated to averi;tge 1.5 hours per re~ponSl' The burden estimate includes the
time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sourees, gathering and :naintaining the needed data, and
completing and rcvicwi ng the form. Send comments regarding the accuracy of lh(: hurden csti mate and any suggcslion~
for reducing this hurden, to: Information Collections Management, Federal I<:mergency \Ianagement ^gency, 500 C
Street, S. W., Washington, DC 20472; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (3067-
01481, Washington. DC 20003.

---

-

Community Name:

City of Greeley

Flooding Source:

Cache La Poudre River

PrOject Name/Identifier:

City of Greelev

1. MAPPING CHANGES

I. ^ topographic work map of suitable scale, contour interval, and planimetric definition must be submitted showing
(indicate NIA when flul applicuble):

2.

3

Included

A.
B.
C
[)

Revised approximate 1 DO-year noodplain boundaries (Zone A) [ZJ Yes [J :-<0 0 N/A
Revised detailed 100- and 500-year noodplain boundaries 0 Yes 00 No 0 :-</A
Revised 1 00. year noodway boundaries . . . . . . . . IZl Yes 0 :-<0 0 :-</A
Location and alignment of all cross sections used in the revised
hydraulic model with stationing control indicated ~ Yes 0 :-10 0 :-</A
Stream alignments. road and dam alignments . . . . . . . . . . . . . [ZJ Yes 0 No 0 N/A
Current community boundaries ............. .......... 0 Yes 0 :-<0 [] "I/A
I<:ffcclive 100- and 500-year noodplain and 100-year flood way
boundaries from the I'IRMIFIWM reduced or enlarged to the
scale of the topographic work map .......... 0 Yes IZl :'\J"o 0 N/^
Tic-ins between the effective and revised 100- and 500-year
noodplains and J DO-year noodway boundaries 00 Yes 0 ~o 0 N/A
The requestor's property boundaries and community easements 0 Yes 0 No [] :-I/^
The signed cerLil1cation of a registered professional engineer ~ Yes 0 :'-[0 0 N/^
I.ocalion and description of reference marks [XJ Yes 0 ~o 0 N/^
Vertical datum (example: NGVD, NA VD etc.) [XJ Yes 0 "10 0 N/^
Coastal zune designations tie into adjacent lll'eclS not being revised 0 Yes 0 ~() [] :-I/A
Location and alignment of all coastal transects used to revise the
coastal analyses ............. 0 Yes 0 No KJ "I/^

E.
F.

G.

11

I.
J.
K.
L.

M.

N.

If any of the items above afe marked no or N/^. please explain:__ (B) Detailed revisions to lOO-year
floodplain enclosed, changes to SOO-year foodp~.ain negU.able. (G) Final mapping
was not prepared by FEMA for portions of the study area.

What is the source and date of the updated topographic information (example: orlhophoto mal's, July 19H6; field
survey, May /979, beach profiles, June 19H7. elc.)? 1987 Aeri~l photography and 19Y3 field surveys

What is the ~cale and contour interval of the following wOI'kmaps?
a. Effective FIS scale
b. Revision Request 1"=200' scale 2--foot

Contour interval
Contour interval

NOTE: I{evised topographic information must be of equal or greater detail.

4. Attach an annotated 1"mM and FIWM at the scale of the effective FI!{M and I"BFM showing the revised I DO-year
and 50G-ycar l100dplains and the lOO-year flood way boundarics and how they Lie into those shown on the effective
!<')I{M and FBI"Yil downstream and upstream of the rev ision or adjacent to the area of revision for coa~tal stud ie::-i.

^ttach additional pages ifneeded.

FEMA Form 81-89D,AUG 93

Riverine/Coastal Mapping "arm

IOlmS

Pag~ 1 01 3