Laserfiche WebLink
<br />for the respective future floods und,e;r existing and. post pro,1eet <br /> <br />conditions at Granada. <br /> <br />d. Estimated. future flood. ere'lts and pertinent elevations <br /> <br />at bridge erossings vithin the studJ' I~re'a are listed in Table 4. <br /> <br />For study purposes herein, it has been assumed tha.t limited clogging <br /> <br />can be expected and all bridge struett~es would stand intact. Signi- <br /> <br />ficant changes in this premise, impos~,d by differing conditions of <br /> <br />a future flood, could alter the estimated flood crests and flood <br /> <br />limits shown in the table and related plates. <br /> <br />TABLE; 3 <br />-- <br /> <br />FLOOD ClIARACTERISTICS OF WOLF CREEK .- Averajled Maximum Conditions <br /> <br />Characteristic <br /> <br />Magnitude <br />Standard <br />Project <br />l"lood <br /> <br />of Occurrence <br />Inte:rmediate <br />Regional <br />Flood <br /> <br />Existin~ Conditions: <br />Peak Discharge (c.f.s.) <br /> <br />41,000 <br /> <br />27,000 <br /> <br />Height of rise above bankfull (feet) <br /> <br />5.0 <br />4 <br /> <br />3.9 <br />3 <br /> <br />Main Channel Velocity (feet per second) <br /> <br />Overbank Velocity (feet per seeood) <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />Post Project Conditions: <br /> <br />Peak discharge (c.f.s.) <br />Height of rise above bankfull (feet) <br /> <br />41,000 <br /> <br />27,000 <br /> <br />3,6 <br /> <br />2.6 <br /> <br />Main Channel Velocity (feet per second) <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />Overbank Velocity (feet per second) <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />2.8 <br /> <br />App. 3 <br />15 <br />