My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00742
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00742
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:29:19 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:27:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
356.03
County
Prowers
Community
Granada
Stream Name
Arkansas River, Wolf Creek
Title
Floodplain Information Report - Granada
Date
7/1/1994
Designation Date
7/1/1994
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />were useu to define the 2 and 20 percent curves for drainage area sizes <br /> <br />not defined in the study area. The plot of drainage areas used to <br />develop the two curves on plate 3 include the records of four streams <br />in the adjacent Kansas River drainage area, t\Vo crest-s1:age partial- <br /> <br />record stations in the study aJ~ea, one station in the Arkansas River <br /> <br />drainage area adjacent to the study, area, and seven gagi.nl~ stations in <br /> <br />the study area. A listing of pertinent data for the 14 locations is <br /> <br />given in table 1. <br />20. The peak frequency curve for Wolf Creek at Granada was constructed <br /> <br /> <br />by use of the ratio of Q/QUllG for the 5 and SO-year floods from the <br /> <br /> <br />frequency development curves for the Arkansas River from John 1.lartin Dam <br /> <br /> <br />to Great Bend, Kansas. Nith the use of these ratios anu the peak of the <br /> <br /> <br />unit hydrograph, the 20 percent: and 2 percent flow peaks were determined. <br />These values were plotted on log probability c.oordinates and a line drawn <br /> <br /> <br />through the points. To complete the curve, 25-year likeliness \Vas added. <br /> <br /> <br />This adjustment was based on the average length of streamflO\v records <br /> <br /> <br />that were used in the determination of the frequency development curves. <br /> <br />Likeliness factors \vere not considered during construction of the develop- <br /> <br />ment curves. The peak frequency curve for Wolf Creek at Granada is shown <br /> <br /> <br />on plate 4. <br /> <br /> <br />21. Coincident Flow. FlOlv conditions on the Arkansas River coinciden t <br /> <br /> <br />with peak flO\vs on Nolf Creek were required in order to determine starting <br /> <br /> <br />elevations for water surface profi les. Records of flow on the Arkansas <br /> <br />Ri ver at Lamar and Holly, COlorado were used wi th peak flows on 1'101 f Creek <br /> <br />to develop coincident flows. These were plotted to determine the curve <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.