Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />The drainage basin consists of Vlm loams at the upper end <br /> <br /> <br />of the basin and channel, Samsil-Shingle complex soils in the <br /> <br /> <br />middle channel and basin, and Nunn Clay loams and loamy alluvial <br /> <br /> <br />land near the river. These soils are described in the Soil <br /> <br /> <br />Survey of Adams County, Colorado, published by the Soil Conser- <br /> <br /> <br />vation Service, as having moderate to very low permeability. <br /> <br /> <br />The static water table in the loamy alluvial land near the river <br /> <br /> <br />is seasonally about three feet below the surface. <br /> <br /> <br />The Regional Park Tributary Basin watershed consists of <br /> <br /> <br />8.75 square miles, and is about as long as it is wide. The two <br /> <br /> <br />independent tributaries flow eastward and combine just before <br /> <br /> <br />their confluence with the South Platte River in Adams County. <br /> <br />The lOa-year floodplains presented in this report, however, <br /> <br /> <br />are based upon future or "fully developed" land use conditions. <br /> <br /> <br />Anticipated conditions show a development pattern of residential <br /> <br /> <br />housing in Adams County at a density of four dwelling units per <br /> <br /> <br />acre. Future development of Brantner Gulch Basin within <br /> <br /> <br />Thornton City Limits is assumed to be the same as that illustrated <br /> <br /> <br />in Thorntan's 1979 Future Land Use Map. <br /> <br />III. ADDITIONAL STUDIES AND PERTINENT DATA <br /> <br />General <br /> <br /> <br />The land use in the drainage basins has been herein des- <br /> <br /> <br />cribed as residential for the upper Brantner Gulch Basin, <br /> <br /> <br />agricultural or undeveloped for the middle Brantner Gulch Basin <br /> <br /> <br />and commercial for the lower Brantner Gulch Basin. Land use in <br /> <br /> <br />the Regional Park Tributary (RPT) Basin is primarily undeveloped <br /> <br /> <br />or agricultural property. The existing land use in the lower <br /> <br />RPT basin is predominantly commercial. <br /> <br />Two prior flood studies have been performed for the City of <br /> <br /> <br />Thornton. In 1980, Merrick and Company prepared a Master Drainage <br /> <br /> <br />Plan for the City. This study and report were very comprehensive <br /> <br /> <br />but did not address the need for a Probable Maximum Precipitation <br /> <br /> <br />(PMP) flood analysis in Eastlake Darn No. 2 and No. 3 as it relates <br /> <br /> <br />to flood control in the Brantner Gulch Basin. Some of the recom- <br /> <br /> <br />mendations in the Merrick report were considered in this FHAD study. <br /> <br /> <br />In 1981, Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. prepared a report <br /> <br /> <br />on the condition of Eastlake Dam and Reservo~r No.3. The report <br /> <br /> <br />addressed the need for PMP flood routing considerations and <br /> <br /> <br />requ~red ~mprovements to the dam. The PMP storm used in the 1981 <br /> <br /> <br />report appeared to be of smaller magnitude than the PMP storm <br /> <br /> <br />determined by the method shown in "Design of Small Dams" by the <br /> <br /> <br />U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (recommended by UDFCD) and used in <br /> <br /> <br />this study and report. <br /> <br />The County Fairgrounds area is located in the level plain <br /> <br /> <br />adjacent to the Platte River. Flows from Brantner Gulch and the <br /> <br /> <br />South Regional Park Tributary VI combine for the lOa-year flood <br /> <br /> <br />and cause a majority of the County Regional Park area to be <br /> <br /> <br />flooded for the laO-year event. <br />