Laserfiche WebLink
<br />stream of Montrose. These frequency curves were computed by statis- <br />tical analyses of stream gage data for 58 years of record at the <br />Delta gage and 57 years of record at the Colona gage. The indepen- <br />dent frequency curveS for rainfall and snowmelt events were combined <br />statistically to get "all-event" frequency curves at the gage loca- <br />tions. Because the two all-event frequency curves were nearly <br />identical at the two gage locations, the peak discharges for the <br />10-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year floods were computed to be constant <br />between the gages. This indicates that attenuation and stream <br />diversions counterbalance tributary inflow between the stations. <br /> <br />Peak discharge-drainage area relationships for the study streams <br />in the City of Montrose are shown in Table 2. <br /> <br />The peak discharges for Cedar Creek and Montrose Arroyo were deter- <br />mined by the CWCB in April 1979 (Reference 2). <br /> <br />Rainfall data for the CWCB study were statistically analyzed to <br />define recurrence interval probabilities and the resultant rainfall- <br />frequency relationship for both the upper basin areas, as well as <br />the City of Montrose. This rainfall relation was then graduated <br />between the City of Montrose and the upper basin areas according <br />to the predominant regional precipitation pattern shown in the <br />National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Atlas (Reference 8). <br /> <br />For the overall flood plain analysis, the runoff hydrographs were <br />developed by using the U.S. Soil Conservation Service procedure <br />for each of the individual subbasins. All channel routings were <br />developed using the Muskingum procedure. This process was accom- <br />plished for the various subbasins comprising each of the two major <br />basins (Cedar Creek and Montrose Arroyo). The result was composite <br />hydrographs at each design point for each design storm. <br /> <br />The impact of snowmelt was examined (and is included) for the over- <br />all flood plain analysis. Snowmelt affects peak flow rate, as it <br />establishes the base streamflow, to which the peak flow is added. <br />Numerous drainage basins (judged to be reasonably similar to the <br />study basins) for which snowmelt data are available were examined. <br />From these data, the 100-year frequency snowmelt relation of flow <br />to drainage basin area was defined for the Montrose study area. <br />These data, in turn, were used to define the snowmelt frequency- <br />flow relation. The snowmelt frequency-flow curve was then statisti- <br />cally combined with the corresponding curve based on rainfall. <br />Snowmelt data rainfall data were combined after the rainfall-generated <br />runoff hydrographs for the various subbasins were combined. <br /> <br />Ditch crossings in the study basins, with the exception of the <br />South Canal, were all handled in the same manner for the purposes <br />of the hydrograph routing procedure. The ditches were assumed to <br /> <br />10 <br />