My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00714
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00714
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:37:42 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:26:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Montrose
Community
Montrose
Title
FIS - Montrose
Date
7/17/1986
Prepared For
Montrose
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Current FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />stream of Montrose. These frequency curves were computed by statis- <br />tical analyses of stream gage data for 58 years of record at the <br />Delta gage and 57 years of record at the Colona gage. The indepen- <br />dent frequency curveS for rainfall and snowmelt events were combined <br />statistically to get "all-event" frequency curves at the gage loca- <br />tions. Because the two all-event frequency curves were nearly <br />identical at the two gage locations, the peak discharges for the <br />10-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year floods were computed to be constant <br />between the gages. This indicates that attenuation and stream <br />diversions counterbalance tributary inflow between the stations. <br /> <br />Peak discharge-drainage area relationships for the study streams <br />in the City of Montrose are shown in Table 2. <br /> <br />The peak discharges for Cedar Creek and Montrose Arroyo were deter- <br />mined by the CWCB in April 1979 (Reference 2). <br /> <br />Rainfall data for the CWCB study were statistically analyzed to <br />define recurrence interval probabilities and the resultant rainfall- <br />frequency relationship for both the upper basin areas, as well as <br />the City of Montrose. This rainfall relation was then graduated <br />between the City of Montrose and the upper basin areas according <br />to the predominant regional precipitation pattern shown in the <br />National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Atlas (Reference 8). <br /> <br />For the overall flood plain analysis, the runoff hydrographs were <br />developed by using the U.S. Soil Conservation Service procedure <br />for each of the individual subbasins. All channel routings were <br />developed using the Muskingum procedure. This process was accom- <br />plished for the various subbasins comprising each of the two major <br />basins (Cedar Creek and Montrose Arroyo). The result was composite <br />hydrographs at each design point for each design storm. <br /> <br />The impact of snowmelt was examined (and is included) for the over- <br />all flood plain analysis. Snowmelt affects peak flow rate, as it <br />establishes the base streamflow, to which the peak flow is added. <br />Numerous drainage basins (judged to be reasonably similar to the <br />study basins) for which snowmelt data are available were examined. <br />From these data, the 100-year frequency snowmelt relation of flow <br />to drainage basin area was defined for the Montrose study area. <br />These data, in turn, were used to define the snowmelt frequency- <br />flow relation. The snowmelt frequency-flow curve was then statisti- <br />cally combined with the corresponding curve based on rainfall. <br />Snowmelt data rainfall data were combined after the rainfall-generated <br />runoff hydrographs for the various subbasins were combined. <br /> <br />Ditch crossings in the study basins, with the exception of the <br />South Canal, were all handled in the same manner for the purposes <br />of the hydrograph routing procedure. The ditches were assumed to <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.