Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. . <br />, <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />:J2PARTMENT OF THE ARMY <br />OY,A}L\ D~STRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS <br />O:'lARA, NEBRASKA 68102 <br /> <br />SUPP;:::MENT TO INTERIM REPORT AND APPENDICES, <br />BEAR CREEK, COLORADO <br /> <br />MOUN~ CARBON RESERVOIR WITH OPTIMUM <br />RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN <br />September 1967 <br /> <br />1, fURPOSE <br /> <br />Following review of the Chief of Engineers' proposed report on <br />the Bear Creek basin, Colorado, the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation <br />recommended certain substantial modifications in the recreational <br />aspects of the dam and reservoir project recommended by the reporting <br />officers and concurred in by the Board of Engineers for Rivers and <br />Harbors. This supplement presents a discussion and evaluation of the <br />recommendations made by the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation. It summarizes <br />the project:osts and benefits associated with such additional development, <br />and it provides cost allocations and cost-sharing data. <br /> <br />2. DESCRIPrION OF PLAN OF IMPROVEMENT <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />a. The reporting officers recommended a plan of improvement <br />consisti:J.g of a multip:.e-purpose dam and reservoir on Bear Creek, <br />approximately 8 miles upstream from the confluence of Bear Creek <br />and the South Platte Rive::', at Denver, that would provide flood <br />protection for metropolitan Denver and the rural reaches of the <br />South P1e.tte River &ownstream from Denver. The Division Engineer <br />recommended, as a ~ooential maximum modification of the original <br />plan of development} a plall essentially equivalent to the alterna- <br />tive plac:: 5 presentao, in the basic report of the District Engineer. <br />Recommendation of "t,he more cos1;ly alternative was based on the <br />probability that foundation conditions unsuited to the origir.al plan <br />might be revealed during advanced planning studi,es, wher: more detailed <br />subsurface explorations would be undertaken. The recommended project, <br />therefore, represeI'.ts the Claximum structure that might be required <br />U!lder adverse foundation conditions. This would include an earthfill <br />dam 162 feet high, with a crest length of about 4,400 feet, and a <br />supplementaIJ' earth fill dike, with a height of 50 feet and a crest <br />length of 2'1'00 feet, to the south of the main embankment. An earth- <br />and rock-cut emergency spillway would be provided to insure the safety <br />of the structure. The reservoir would prOVide storage capacity of <br />74,750 acre-feet, of which 2,400 acre-feet would be for sediment reserve <br />and recreatic.n, 26,000 acre-feet would be for flood control, and 46,350 <br />acre-feet wOc.ld be for surcharge storage. An ungated service outlet <br />would be provided for flood control releases, and a gated low-flow <br />outlet would be provided for release of streamflow requirements. <br />Pertinent data for the l~commended project a~e presented in table 1. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />---- -,~ <br />