Laserfiche WebLink
<br />While this was not the case, our relatively disorganized but enthusiastic effort still appears to <br />have been highly effective. <br /> <br />Database Development <br /> <br />As storm reports were coming in and being processed, other office staff developed a simple <br />spreadsheet database to enter all reports for later analysis. One of the complicating factors in <br />developing this database was the irregular observation intervals. Some observers only <br />recorded total rainfall for the entire 2-day period. Others read and emptied their gauges once <br />each day at the same precise time. There were also some very motivated individuals who <br />made a special effort to read their gauges several times during the storm and note the time of <br />each reading. This information, along with even more detailed reports from the few recording <br />gauges, made it possible to develop a thorough time history of rainfall throughout this <br />exceptional event. <br /> <br />The resulting database was set up to accommodate any time interval measurement from hourly <br />values on up to simple storm totals. Each report was assigned a precise latitude and longitude <br />using special mapping software currently available. Accurate coordinates were critical for <br />objective plotting and computer analysis of rainfall. Colorado Climate Center staff also made <br />use of a Global Positioning System (GPS) unit to pinpoint observations coordinates. Visiting <br />each site with the GPS proved to be much more time consuming and no more !lCCIJI1lte than <br />using mapping and address software, so most of the coordinates were found using the <br />computer without leaving the office. <br /> <br />Storm Analysis and Rainfall Mapping <br /> <br />As the database was assembled, analysis and mapping began. Figure 2 shows the locations of <br />rainfall reports that were gathered in the weeks immediately following the Fort Collins flood. <br />The majority of these reports came from the immediate Fort Collins area, but others were <br />scattered around the county. A few data points from adjacent counties were included to more <br />clearly define the limits of this rather smaI1 storm system. In some portions of the Fort Collins <br />area, data reports were numerous with several reports per square mile. Rainfall reports were <br />very sparse for other areas, particularly immediately west and southwest of Fort Collins. <br /> <br />The wide variety of rainfall measurements: recording rain gauges, official weather stations, <br />hobby weather watchers, casual onlookers, mixed with uncalibrated bucket measurements, <br />produced an awkward data set. Varied measurement intervals ranging from detailed minute- <br />by-minute reports to single storm totals added another dimension of complexity. But while <br />posing a great challenge, these diverse data also contained additional valuable information. <br />The combination of overlapping measurement intervals from a very large number of locations <br />sometimes only blocks from each other, offered an opportunity to extract detailed information <br />about the storm's time history. This would not have been an issue had the storm been just one <br />downpour. However, by looking at the data, it was very evident that there were several <br />distinct periods of rain, some locally very heavy, that fell during the 24 hours prior to the <br /> <br />9 <br />